Mahony J B, Luinstra K E, Waner J, McNab G, Hobranzska H, Gregson D, Sellors J W, Chernesky M A
Department of Pathology, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):87-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.87-91.1994.
We conducted a tricenter interlaboratory agreement study to assess the agreement of PCR results obtained for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens. A total of 120 specimens (49 positive and 71 negative), including 20 first-void urine samples, 50 endocervical and 50 urethral swabs (40 males), were coded and sent from a reference laboratory (laboratory A) to two other laboratories. Laboratories B and C were provided with a standardized protocol and reagent package including two sets of plasmid PCR primers (KL1-KL2 and T1-T2) and were asked to test each specimen with the first set of primers (KL1-KL2) and to confirm positives with the second set of primers (T1-T2). Laboratory B identified 47 of 49 positives and 69 of 70 negatives (one specimen dried up on shipping) following the initial PCR, for an accuracy of 97.5% (116 of 119), and 47 of 49 positives and 70 of 70 negatives after confirmatory testing of the positives, for an accuracy of 98.3% (117 of 119). Laboratory C identified 42 of 49 positives and 70 of 70 negatives for the initial PCR, for an accuracy of 94.1% (112 of 119), and 39 of 42 positives and 70 of 70 negatives for the confirmatory PCR, for an accuracy of 91.6% (109 of 119). The overall accuracy of PCR testing was 96.6% (345 of 357). The kappa agreement statistics for agreement between pairs of laboratories after confirmation of positives were 0.97 for laboratories A and B, 0.83 for laboratories B and C, and 0.83 for laboratories A and C. Use of the confirmatory PCR improved the specificity and overall accuracy of results for individual laboratories but reduced slightly the results obtained for agreement between laboratories. These results demonstrate that when standardized reagents and protocols are used, PCR results are highly reproducible and excellent agreement between laboratories is obtainable.
我们开展了一项三中心实验室间一致性研究,以评估泌尿生殖道标本中沙眼衣原体检测的聚合酶链反应(PCR)结果的一致性。总共120份标本(49份阳性和71份阴性),包括20份首次晨尿样本、50份宫颈拭子和50份尿道拭子(40份来自男性),经过编码后从一个参考实验室(实验室A)送至另外两个实验室。向实验室B和C提供了标准化方案和试剂包,其中包括两组质粒PCR引物(KL1-KL2和T1-T2),并要求它们先用第一组引物(KL1-KL2)检测每份标本,然后用第二组引物(T1-T2)对阳性结果进行确认。实验室B在初次PCR后识别出49份阳性标本中的47份以及70份阴性标本中的69份(1份标本在运输途中干涸),准确率为97.5%(119份中的116份),在对阳性结果进行确认检测后识别出49份阳性标本中的47份以及70份阴性标本中的70份,准确率为98.3%(119份中的117份)。实验室C在初次PCR后识别出49份阳性标本中的42份以及70份阴性标本中的70份,准确率为94.1%(119份中的112份),在确认性PCR后识别出42份阳性标本中的39份以及70份阴性标本中的70份,准确率为91.6%(119份中的109份)。PCR检测的总体准确率为96.6%(357份中的345份)。在对阳性结果进行确认后,实验室A和B之间的kappa一致性统计值为0.97,实验室B和C之间为0.83,实验室A和C之间为0.83。使用确认性PCR提高了各个实验室结果的特异性和总体准确率,但略微降低了实验室之间一致性的结果。这些结果表明,当使用标准化试剂和方案时,PCR结果具有高度可重复性,并且实验室之间可获得极佳的一致性。