Turiano Nicholas A, Graham Eileen K, Weston Sara J, Booth Tom, Harrison Fleur, James Bryan D, Lewis Nathan A, Makkar Steven R, Mueller Swantje, Wisniewski Kristi M, Zhaoyang Ruixue, Spiro Avron, Willis Sherry, Schaie K Warner, Lipton Richard B, Katz Mindy, Sliwinski Martin, Deary Ian J, Zelinski Elizabeth M, Bennett David A, Sachdev Perminder S, Brodaty Henry, Trollor Julian N, Ames David, Wright Margaret J, Gerstorf Denis, Muniz-Terrera Graciela, Piccinin Andrea M, Hofer Scott M, Mroczek Daniel K
West Virginia University, Department of Psychology and the West Virginia Prevention Research Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Northwestern University, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA.
Collabra Psychol. 2020;6(1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.268. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Individual differences in the Big Five personality traits have emerged as predictors of health and longevity. Although there are robust protective effects for higher levels of conscientiousness, results are mixed for other personality traits. In particular, higher levels of neuroticism have significantly predicted an increased risk of mortality, no-risk at all, and even a reduced risk of dying. The current study hypothesizes that one potential reason for the discrepancy in these findings for neuroticism is that interactions among neuroticism and other key personality traits have largely been ignored. Thus, in the current study we focus on testing whether the personality traits neuroticism and conscientiousness interact to predict mortality. Specifically, we borrow from recent evidence of "healthy neuroticism" to explore whether higher levels of neuroticism are only a risk factor for increased mortality risk when conscientiousness levels are low. We conducted a pre-registered integrative data analysis using 12 different cohort studies (total = 44,702). Although a consistent pattern emerged of higher levels of conscientiousness predicting a reduced hazard of dying, neuroticism did not show a consistent pattern of prediction. Moreover, no study provided statistical evidence of a neuroticism by conscientiousness interaction. The current findings do not support the idea that the combination of high conscientiousness and high neuroticism can be protective for longevity. Future work is needed to explore different protective factors that may buffer the negative effects of higher levels of neuroticism on health, as well as other behaviors and outcomes that may support the construct of healthy neuroticism.
大五人格特质中的个体差异已成为健康和长寿的预测指标。虽然较高的尽责性具有强大的保护作用,但其他人格特质的结果却喜忧参半。特别是,较高水平的神经质显著预测了死亡率增加的风险、完全无风险,甚至是死亡风险降低。当前的研究假设,这些关于神经质研究结果存在差异的一个潜在原因是,神经质与其他关键人格特质之间的相互作用在很大程度上被忽视了。因此,在当前的研究中,我们专注于测试神经质和尽责性这两个人格特质是否相互作用来预测死亡率。具体来说,我们借鉴最近“健康神经质”的证据,探讨是否只有在尽责性水平较低时,较高水平的神经质才是死亡率增加风险的一个危险因素。我们使用12项不同的队列研究(共计44,702人)进行了一项预先注册的综合数据分析。虽然出现了一种一致的模式,即较高的尽责性预测死亡风险降低,但神经质并没有显示出一致的预测模式。此外,没有研究提供神经质与尽责性相互作用的统计证据。当前的研究结果不支持高尽责性和高神经质相结合对长寿有保护作用的观点。未来需要开展工作,探索可能缓冲较高水平神经质对健康产生的负面影响的不同保护因素,以及可能支持健康神经质这一概念的其他行为和结果。