Suppr超能文献

狐狸狂犬病的防控:哪些是恰当的措施?

Control of rabies in foxes: what are the appropriate measures?

作者信息

Aubert M

机构信息

WHO/OIE Collaborative Centre, CNEVA, Malzéville, France.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 1994 Jan 15;134(3):55-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.134.3.55.

Abstract

Until recent years, the depopulation of reservoir species was the only feasible measure to break the transmission chain of rabies in wildlife. In Europe at the beginning of this century, when applied with compulsory muzzling and restrictions on movement, dog depopulation was shown to be effective before any large scale vaccination of dogs. Some examples of the success of the application of depopulation measures on wild carnivores in the past are described. But in the case of enzootics of rabies in the fox, the control measures applied to fox populations sometimes decreased the prevalence or postponed the invasion of an area but did not free or protect an area permanently. Some examples taken from France illustrate the difficulties of drawing clear conclusions from the results of control measures. Conversely, the oral vaccination of foxes was demonstrably successful in preventing the spread of rabies. However, mathematical modelling, historical considerations and first observations in areas in which foxes have been vaccinated strongly suggest that the 'traditional' methods of controlling fox populations, at least by hunting, should not be restricted because they complement the effects of vaccination.

摘要

直到近年来,减少宿主物种数量一直是打破野生动物狂犬病传播链的唯一可行措施。在本世纪初的欧洲,当配合强制戴嘴套和限制行动实施时,在大规模给狗接种疫苗之前,捕杀狗被证明是有效的。文中描述了过去在野生食肉动物身上应用减少数量措施取得成功的一些例子。但就狐狸狂犬病地方流行而言,针对狐狸种群采取的控制措施有时会降低发病率或推迟疾病侵入某个地区,但并不能使一个地区永远摆脱或得到保护。从法国选取的一些例子说明了从控制措施结果中得出明确结论的困难。相反,给狐狸口服疫苗在预防狂犬病传播方面明显取得了成功。然而,数学模型、历史考量以及在狐狸已接种疫苗地区的初步观察结果都有力地表明,控制狐狸种群的“传统”方法,至少是通过狩猎的方法,不应受到限制,因为它们能补充疫苗接种的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验