Jordan J E, Pelc N J, Enzmann D R
Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Calif.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994 Jan-Feb;4(1):25-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880040108.
Normal blood flow and velocity in the superior sagittal sinus were measured in 30 patients. A fast two-dimensional ungated phase-contrast (PC) pulse sequence was compared with a peripherally gated cine PC technique for velocity and flow quantitation. The same imaging parameters were used for both methods. Measured values for mean velocity and flow obtained with the two methods were compared by using regression analysis and t testing. For blood flow, the correlation coefficient was .976. For velocity measurements, r was .950. Mean flow was 285 mL/min +/- 19 with the ungated PC method and 281 mL/min +/- 19 with the cine PC method. The mean velocities measured with the two methods were 12.94 cm/sec +/- 1.1 and 13.59 cm/sec +/- 1.1, respectively. There was no significant difference (paired t test) between the methods for mean flow or velocity data. This was true even though flow in the superior sagittal sinus is moderately pulsatile, as shown with the cine PC technique. The ungated PC method provided these data in 13 seconds versus 3.5 minutes for the cine PC method.
对30例患者的上矢状窦正常血流和速度进行了测量。将快速二维非门控相位对比(PC)脉冲序列与外周门控电影PC技术进行比较,以进行速度和流量定量。两种方法使用相同的成像参数。通过回归分析和t检验比较两种方法获得的平均速度和流量的测量值。对于血流量,相关系数为0.976。对于速度测量,r为0.950。非门控PC方法测得的平均流量为285 mL/min±19,电影PC方法测得的平均流量为281 mL/min±19。两种方法测得的平均速度分别为12.94 cm/sec±1.1和13.59 cm/sec±1.1。两种方法在平均流量或速度数据方面无显著差异(配对t检验)。即使如电影PC技术所示,上矢状窦的血流有中度搏动,情况也是如此。非门控PC方法在13秒内提供了这些数据,而电影PC方法则需要3.5分钟。