Elliott D
University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Science, School of Nursing, NSW, Australia.
Heart Lung. 1994 Jan-Feb;23(1):27-35.
To test the efficacy of music and muscle relaxation techniques in reducing the anxiety of patients admitted to a coronary care unit with ischemic heart disease.
Randomized, controlled trial.
Seven-bed coronary care unit of an Australian tertiary care hospital.
Fifty-six patients admitted to a coronary care unit with unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction.
Psychologic (State Trait Anxiety Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Linear Analogue Anxiety Scale) and physiologic (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate) variables were measured as indicators of anxiety.
Two or three 30-minute sessions of audiotape interventions were conducted with portable tape players with headphones. The two intervention tapes consisted of light classical music and verbal instructions for muscle relaxation.
With analysis of variance procedures, the null hypotheses were supported. No significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups were demonstrated for the psychologic or physiologic variables; that is, no significant reductions in anxiety were achieved for patients using music or muscle relaxation interventions when compared with the control group. The effect size of the interventions on the outcome measures was 0.19 to 0.22, indicating a small effect. Resultant power was at a low level.
These results differ from those of similar studies but may be related to the high probability of a type II error. Further investigation with longer intervention sessions and larger sample sizes is indicated. Similar studies should incorporate power analysis when reporting their results.
测试音乐和肌肉放松技巧在减轻因缺血性心脏病入住冠心病监护病房患者焦虑方面的疗效。
随机对照试验。
澳大利亚一家三级护理医院的七张床位的冠心病监护病房。
56名因不稳定型心绞痛或急性心肌梗死入住冠心病监护病房的患者。
测量心理(状态特质焦虑量表、医院焦虑抑郁量表、线性模拟焦虑量表)和生理(收缩压、舒张压和心率)变量作为焦虑指标。
使用带耳机的便携式磁带播放器进行两到三次30分钟的录音带干预。两盒干预磁带包括轻音乐和肌肉放松的口头指导。
通过方差分析程序,原假设得到支持。在心理或生理变量上,两组之间未显示出显著差异(p<0.05);也就是说,与对照组相比,使用音乐或肌肉放松干预的患者焦虑没有显著减轻。干预措施对观察指标的效应大小为0.19至0.22,表明效果较小。结果效能处于较低水平。
这些结果与类似研究的结果不同,但可能与II类错误的高概率有关。表明需要进行更长干预疗程和更大样本量的进一步研究。类似研究在报告结果时应纳入效能分析。