Dahmash N S, Chowdhury M N
Department of Medicine and Microbiology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Thorax. 1994 Jan;49(1):71-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.1.71.
Appropriate treatment of severe community and hospital acquired pneumonias requiring admission to a medical intensive care unit depends on knowledge of the likely aetiological agents in any community. Little is known about the pattern and outcome of patients with such pneumonias in Saudi Arabia.
In a prospective study 113 patients with pneumonia were investigated in the medical intensive care unit at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between September 1991 and December 1992. The diagnosis was established by microscopy and culture of sputum, blood culture, or serological examination. A standard proforma was used to collect demographic, clinical, and laboratory data.
A microbiological diagnosis was made in 80% of the cases with a single pathogen accounting for 69% of the isolates and multiple pathogens for 11%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common infecting agent (16%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (12%), Staphylococcus aureus (9%), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (8%). Pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophilia was diagnosed in three patients and infection due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in two. These five cases were identified by serological examination. Gram negative rods were the predominant pathogens in both community and hospital acquired pneumonia. The aetiology of pneumonia was not identified in 20% of cases. The overall mortality was 37%. Patients with hospital acquired pneumonia had a higher mortality than those with a community acquired pneumonia. Similarly, a high mortality was found in patients who had a serious underlying disease, abnormal mental state, diastolic blood pressure < 60 mm Hg, blood urea > 7 mmol/l, abnormal liver function tests, serum albumin < 30 g/l, those who required mechanical ventilatory support, and those with APACHE II scores > 20.
This study highlights two major findings which differ from previous reports on the aetiology of pneumonia. Firstly, Gram negative rods were the predominant pathogens in community acquired pneumonia and secondly, M tuberculosis was an important cause of pneumonia in these patients, indicating that tuberculous pneumonia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.
对于需要入住医疗重症监护病房的严重社区获得性肺炎和医院获得性肺炎,恰当的治疗取决于对任何社区中可能的病原体的了解。关于沙特阿拉伯此类肺炎患者的模式和预后知之甚少。
在一项前瞻性研究中,1991年9月至1992年12月期间,在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的哈立德国王大学医院医疗重症监护病房对113例肺炎患者进行了调查。通过痰液显微镜检查和培养、血培养或血清学检查确诊。使用标准表格收集人口统计学、临床和实验室数据。
80%的病例做出了微生物学诊断,单一病原体占分离株的69%,多种病原体占11%。铜绿假单胞菌是最常见的感染病原体(16%),其次是肺炎链球菌(12%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(9%)和结核分枝杆菌(8%)。3例患者诊断为嗜肺军团菌肺炎,2例患者诊断为肺炎支原体感染。这5例通过血清学检查确诊。革兰氏阴性杆菌是社区获得性肺炎和医院获得性肺炎的主要病原体。20%的病例未明确肺炎的病因。总体死亡率为37%。医院获得性肺炎患者的死亡率高于社区获得性肺炎患者。同样,在有严重基础疾病、精神状态异常、舒张压<60mmHg、血尿素>7mmol/L、肝功能检查异常、血清白蛋白<30g/L、需要机械通气支持以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分>20的患者中发现了高死亡率。
本研究突出了两个与先前关于肺炎病因的报告不同的主要发现。首先,革兰氏阴性杆菌是社区获得性肺炎的主要病原体;其次,结核分枝杆菌是这些患者肺炎的重要病因,这表明在沙特阿拉伯肺炎的鉴别诊断中应考虑结核性肺炎。