• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲全科医生对下呼吸道感染患者住院决策的分析。欧洲呼吸学会社区获得性肺炎欧洲研究小组(ESOCAP)。

An analysis of decisions by European general practitioners to admit to hospital patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The European Study Group of Community Acquired Pneumonia (ESOCAP) of the European Respiratory Society.

作者信息

Schaberg T, Gialdroni-Grassi G, Huchon G, Leophonte P, Manresa F, Woodhead M

机构信息

Pulmonary Section, Chest Clinic Zum, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Thorax. 1996 Oct;51(10):1017-22. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1017.

DOI:10.1136/thx.51.10.1017
PMID:8977603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC472652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify factors on which European general practitioners (GPs) base their decisions to admit to hospital patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI).

METHODS

A survey was carried out from December 1993 to January 1994 to identify factors that affect GPs' decisions to admit to hospital patients with LRTI by collecting data on 2056 patients from 605 GPs in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK.

RESULTS

Only 93 (4.5%) of the patients included in the study were admitted to hospital. Univariate analysis showed that age > 60 years, institutionalisation of the patient, concomitant diseases, cardiac insufficiency, asthma, a diagnosis of pneumonia, and clinical signs such as chest pain, cyanosis, tachypnoea and hypotension significantly (odds ratio (OR) > 2.0, p < 0.002) influenced the decision to admit to hospital. No influence could be shown for sex, smoking habits, history of bronchiectasis or chronic bronchitis, the presence of fever, chills, myalgia, cough or purulent sputum, and the diagnoses of acute bronchitis, influenza or exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. In the multivariate analysis only the presence of chest pain (OR 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5 to 3.5), cyanosis (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.4 to 7.1), dyspnoea (OR 4.9, 95% CI 3.1 to 7.9), and hypotension (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.2), as well as a diagnosis of pneumonia (OR 6.6, 95% CI 4.3 to 10) (all p < 0.00001) remained as factors that significantly affected the decision to admit to hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical signs of severe infection and a diagnosis of pneumonia are the main factors that induce GPs to admit patients with LRTI to hospital in Europe.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定欧洲全科医生(GP)决定收治下呼吸道感染(LRTI)患者时所依据的因素。

方法

于1993年12月至1994年1月开展了一项调查,通过收集来自法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国605名全科医生的2056例患者的数据,来确定影响全科医生收治下呼吸道感染患者决策的因素。

结果

纳入研究的患者中仅有93例(4.5%)被收治入院。单因素分析显示,年龄>60岁、患者入住养老院、合并症、心功能不全、哮喘、肺炎诊断以及胸痛、发绀、呼吸急促和低血压等临床体征对收治决策有显著影响(比值比(OR)>2.0,p<0.002)。性别、吸烟习惯、支气管扩张或慢性支气管炎病史、发热、寒战、肌痛、咳嗽或脓性痰的存在以及急性支气管炎、流感或慢性支气管炎急性加重的诊断未显示出有影响。多因素分析中,只有胸痛(OR 2.3,95%置信区间(CI)1.5至3.5)、发绀(OR 4.1,95%CI 2.4至7.1)、呼吸困难(OR 4.9,95%CI 3.1至7.9)、低血压(OR 2.9,95%CI 1.6至5.2)以及肺炎诊断(OR 6.6,95%CI 4.3至10)(所有p<0.00001)仍是显著影响收治决策的因素。

结论

严重感染的临床体征和肺炎诊断是欧洲全科医生收治下呼吸道感染患者入院的主要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3611/472652/628c924249b7/thorax00329-0064-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3611/472652/628c924249b7/thorax00329-0064-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3611/472652/628c924249b7/thorax00329-0064-a.jpg

相似文献

1
An analysis of decisions by European general practitioners to admit to hospital patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The European Study Group of Community Acquired Pneumonia (ESOCAP) of the European Respiratory Society.欧洲全科医生对下呼吸道感染患者住院决策的分析。欧洲呼吸学会社区获得性肺炎欧洲研究小组(ESOCAP)。
Thorax. 1996 Oct;51(10):1017-22. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1017.
2
Marked differences in GPs' diagnosis of pneumonia between Denmark and Spain: a cross-sectional study.丹麦和西班牙全科医生对肺炎诊断的显著差异:一项横断面研究。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):454-8. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00093.
3
Initial antibiotic therapy for lower respiratory tract infection in the community: a European survey.社区获得性下呼吸道感染的初始抗生素治疗:一项欧洲调查。
Eur Respir J. 1996 Aug;9(8):1590-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09081590.
4
Antibiotic prescribing for acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) - guideline adherence in the German primary care setting: An analysis of routine data.抗生素治疗急性下呼吸道感染(LRTI)-德国初级保健环境中的指南依从性:常规数据分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0174584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174584. eCollection 2017.
5
[Management of lower respiratory tract infections by general practitioners in France].
Rev Mal Respir. 2001 Apr;18(2):163-70.
6
Clinical factors, C-reactive protein point of care test and chest X-ray in patients with pneumonia: A survey in primary care.肺炎患者的临床因素、C 反应蛋白即时检验和胸部 X 线:初级保健调查。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct;25(4):229-235. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1649651. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Management of lower respiratory tract infections by French general practitioners: the AIR II study. Analyse Infections Respiratoires.法国全科医生对下呼吸道感染的管理:AIR II研究。呼吸道感染分析
Eur Respir J. 2002 Feb;19(2):314-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00219102.
8
Managing LRTI in adults in the community.社区成人下呼吸道感染的管理
Practitioner. 2009 Nov;253(1723):21-5, 2-3.
9
Development of a prediction tool for patients presenting with acute cough in primary care: a prognostic study spanning six European countries.开发一种用于初级保健中急性咳嗽患者的预测工具:一项跨越六个欧洲国家的预后研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e342-e350. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695789. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Treating patients not diagnoses: challenging assumptions underlying the investigation and management of LRTI in general practice.治疗患者而非诊断:挑战基层医疗中下呼吸道感染调查与管理背后的假设。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):941-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki330. Epub 2005 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital admission decisions for older Veterans with community-onset pneumonia: An analysis of 118 U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.老年社区获得性肺炎退伍军人的住院决策:对 118 家美国退伍军人事务医疗中心的分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):398-409. doi: 10.1111/acem.14655.
2
Recognition of sepsis in primary care: a survey among GPs.基层医疗中脓毒症的识别:全科医生调查
BJGP Open. 2017 May 3;1(2):bjgpopen17X100965. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100965.
3
[Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia].[社区获得性肺炎的流行病学]

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of a pneumonia prognostic index using the MedisGroups Comparative Hospital Database.使用MedisGroups比较医院数据库对肺炎预后指数进行验证。
Am J Med. 1993 Feb;94(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90177-q.
2
Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population of four municipalities in eastern Finland.
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 May 1;137(9):977-88. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116770.
3
Risk factors for pneumonia in the elderly.
Am J Med. 1994 Apr;96(4):313-20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90060-4.
4
Aten Primaria. 2013 Dec;45(10):503-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
4
The CURB-65 scoring system in severity assessment of Eastern Nigerian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective observational study.CURB-65评分系统在尼日利亚东部社区获得性肺炎患者严重程度评估中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Jun;22(2):175-80. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00034.
5
Recommendations for the management of cough in adults.成人咳嗽管理建议。
Thorax. 2006 Sep;61 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i1-24. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.065144.
6
Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: disease-specific issues that influence the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy.慢性支气管炎急性加重:影响抗菌治疗成本效益的疾病特异性问题。
Clin Ther. 2001 Mar;23(3):499-512. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80053-9.
7
Parenteral cephalosporin therapy in ambulatory care: advantages and disadvantages.门诊护理中的胃肠外头孢菌素治疗:利弊
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 3:19-28; discussion 47-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059003-00003.
8
Providing better care for patients who may have pneumonia.
Thorax. 1999 Oct;54(10):925-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.10.925.
Re-evaluation of pneumonia requiring admission to an intensive care unit: a prospective study.对需要入住重症监护病房的肺炎的重新评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Thorax. 1994 Jan;49(1):71-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.1.71.
5
Prospective study of aetiology and outcome of adult lower-respiratory-tract infections in the community.社区获得性成人下呼吸道感染病因及转归的前瞻性研究。
Lancet. 1993 Feb 27;341(8844):511-4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90275-l.
6
Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs?基于诊断相关分组的付费方式能控制医院成本吗?
N Engl J Med. 1984 Aug 2;311(5):295-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408023110505.
7
Hospital study of adult community-acquired pneumonia.成人社区获得性肺炎的医院研究。
Lancet. 1982 Jul 31;2(8292):255-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90334-8.
8
Adult pneumonia in a general hospital. Etiology and host risk factors.综合医院中的成人肺炎。病因及宿主危险因素。
Arch Intern Med. 1972 Jun;129(6):935-42.
9
Severe community-acquired pneumonia: factors influencing need of intensive care treatment and prognosis.重症社区获得性肺炎:影响重症监护治疗需求及预后的因素
Scand J Infect Dis. 1985;17(4):377-86. doi: 10.3109/13813458509058778.
10
Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Is it different in the elderly?需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎。在老年人中是否有所不同?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Oct;33(10):671-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb01775.x.