Suppr超能文献

空气中的环境内毒素:采样与分析技术的交叉验证

Airborne environmental endotoxin: a cross-validation of sampling and analysis techniques.

作者信息

Walters M, Milton D, Larsson L, Ford T

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):996-1005. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.3.996-1005.1994.

Abstract

A standard method for measurement of airborne environmental endotoxin was developed and field tested in a fiberglass insulation-manufacturing facility. This method involved sampling with a capillary-pore membrane filter, extraction in buffer using a sonication bath, and analysis by the kinetic-Limulus assay with resistant-parallel-line estimation (KLARE). Cross-validation of the extraction and assay method was performed by comparison with methanolysis of samples followed by 3-hydroxy fatty acid (3-OHFA) analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Direct methanolysis of filter samples and methanolysis of buffer extracts of the filters yielded similar 3-OHFA content (P = 0.72); the average difference was 2.1%. Analysis of buffer extracts for endotoxin content by the KLARE method and by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for 3-OHFA content produced similar results (P = 0.23); the average difference was 0.88%. The source of endotoxin was gram-negative bacteria growing in recycled washwater used to clean the insulation-manufacturing equipment. The endotoxin and bacteria become airborne during spray cleaning operations. The types of 3-OHFAs in bacteria cultured from the washwater, present in the washwater and in the air, were similar. Virtually all of the bacteria cultured from air and water were gram negative composed mostly of two species, Deleya aesta and Acinetobacter johnsonii. Airborne countable bacteria correlated well with endotoxin (r2 = 0.64). Replicate sampling showed that results with the standard sampling, extraction, and Limulus assay by the KLARE method were highly reproducible (95% confidence interval for endotoxin measurement +/- 0.28 log10). These results demonstrate the accuracy, precision, and sensitivity of the standard procedure proposed for airborne environmental endotoxin.

摘要

开发了一种测量空气中环境内毒素的标准方法,并在一家玻璃纤维绝缘材料制造工厂进行了现场测试。该方法包括用毛细管孔膜过滤器采样、在超声浴中用缓冲液提取以及通过带有抗性平行线估计的动力学鲎试剂法(KLARE)进行分析。通过将样品的甲醇解与随后的气相色谱 - 质谱法分析3 - 羟基脂肪酸(3 - OHFA)进行比较,对提取和分析方法进行了交叉验证。过滤器样品的直接甲醇解和过滤器缓冲液提取物的甲醇解产生了相似的3 - OHFA含量(P = 0.72);平均差异为2.1%。用KLARE法分析缓冲液提取物中的内毒素含量以及用气相色谱 - 质谱法分析3 - OHFA含量产生了相似的结果(P = 0.23);平均差异为0.88%。内毒素的来源是生长在用于清洁绝缘材料制造设备的循环洗涤水中的革兰氏阴性细菌。在喷雾清洁操作过程中,内毒素和细菌会进入空气中。从洗涤水、洗涤水和空气中培养的细菌中存在的3 - OHFAs类型相似。几乎所有从空气和水中培养的细菌都是革兰氏阴性菌,主要由两种菌种组成,即埃氏德雷亚菌和约翰逊不动杆菌。空气中可计数细菌与内毒素相关性良好(r2 = 0.64)。重复采样表明,采用标准采样、提取和KLARE法的鲎试剂测定结果具有高度可重复性(内毒素测量的95%置信区间为±0.28 log10)。这些结果证明了所提出的空气中环境内毒素标准程序的准确性、精密度和灵敏度。

相似文献

1
Airborne environmental endotoxin: a cross-validation of sampling and analysis techniques.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):996-1005. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.3.996-1005.1994.
2
Endotoxin measurement: aerosol sampling and application of a new Limulus method.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Jun;51(6):331-7. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369754.
3
Field evaluation of endotoxin air sampling assay methods.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997 Nov;58(11):792-9. doi: 10.1080/15428119791012298.
6
Exposure to airborne culturable microorganisms and endotoxin in two Italian poultry slaughterhouses.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(7):469-78. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.877141.
7
Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 May;61(5):1763-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1763-1769.1995.
8
Environmental endotoxin measurement: the Kinetic Limulus Assay with Resistant-parallel-line Estimation.
Environ Res. 1992 Apr;57(2):212-30. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80081-7.
10
Endotoxin in Size-Separated Metal Working Fluid Aerosol Particles.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Aug;60(7):836-44. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew036. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of lot-to-lot repeatability and effect of assay media choice in the recombinant Factor C assay.
J Environ Monit. 2011 Jun;13(6):1739-45. doi: 10.1039/c1em10035a. Epub 2011 May 9.
3
Effect of extraction and assay media on analysis of airborne endotoxin.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(12):3804-11. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02537-07. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
5
Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2775-80. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2775-2780.2001.
8
Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 May;61(5):1763-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1763-1769.1995.

本文引用的文献

4
Endotoxins in cotton: washing effects and size distribution.
Am J Ind Med. 1983;4(4):515-21. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700040405.
6
Reactions during work shift among cotton mill workers.
Chest. 1983 Oct;84(4):403-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.84.4.403.
8
A Cytophaga species endotoxin as a putative agent of occupation-related lung disease.
Infect Immun. 1984 Jan;43(1):213-6. doi: 10.1128/iai.43.1.213-216.1984.
9
Comparative pyrogenic reactivity of rabbit and man to bacterial endotoxin.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Sep;131(4):1154-8. doi: 10.3181/00379727-131-34059.
10
Endotoxin in cotton dust and respiratory function decrement among cotton workers in an experimental cardroom.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Feb;131(2):209-13. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.2.209.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验