González-Ruiz A, Haque R, Aguirre A, Castañón G, Hall A, Guhl F, Ruiz-Palacios G, Miles M A, Warhurst D C
Department of Medical Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
J Clin Pathol. 1994 Mar;47(3):236-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.3.236.
To assess the reliability of the detection of erythrophagocytic amoebic trophozoites in stool samples in the diagnosis of dysentery associated with invasive Entamoeba histolytica.
Amoebic culture was carried out on single stool samples collected from patients from Mexico, Colombia, and Bangladesh. The stools had been examined by light microscopy. Amoebic dysentery was diagnosed when erythrophagocytic E histolytica trophozoites were observed in a case of bloody diarrhoea. E histolytica isolates were characterised by isoenzyme electrophoresis and results correlated with microscopical findings in stools. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi 2 test.
Where erythrophagocytic amoebae had been observed in dysenteric stool specimens the E histolytica phenotype was invariably invasive (p < 0.0001). Observation of erythrophagocytic amoebae in dysentery is 100% specific and predictive of infection with invasive E histolytica. When amoebic culture-positive cases only are considered it is 96% sensitive. In this study E histolytica of zymodeme XIV was more commonly associated with amoebic dysentery than zymodeme II. There was no significant difference between the carriage rate of invasive and non-invasive E histolytica in non-dysenteric diarrhoea. Asymptomatic subjects carried non-invasive E histolytica more frequently than invasive E histolytica. Patients with non-amoebic dysentery, when shown to be infected with E histolytica, carried non-invasive strains (12%).
Sensitivity and specificity of microscopical examination of a single stool specimen for diagnosing amoebic dysentery is very high; intestinal carriage of invasive E histolytica detected by culture is not necessarily an indication of active disease as patients with diarrhoea and asymptomatic subjects shed invasive and non-invasive E histolytica. There are possibly two subpopulations of invasive E histolytica with different pathogenic potential which can be differentiated by zymodeme analysis.
评估粪便样本中吞噬红细胞的阿米巴滋养体检测在诊断侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴所致痢疾中的可靠性。
对从墨西哥、哥伦比亚和孟加拉国患者采集的单个粪便样本进行阿米巴培养。这些粪便样本已通过光学显微镜检查。在血性腹泻病例中观察到吞噬红细胞的溶组织内阿米巴滋养体时,诊断为阿米巴痢疾。通过同工酶电泳对溶组织内阿米巴分离株进行鉴定,并将结果与粪便中的显微镜检查结果相关联。使用卡方检验进行统计分析。
在痢疾粪便标本中观察到吞噬红细胞的阿米巴时,溶组织内阿米巴表型总是侵袭性的(p<0.0001)。在痢疾中观察到吞噬红细胞的阿米巴具有100%的特异性,可预测侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴感染。仅考虑阿米巴培养阳性病例时,其敏感性为96%。在本研究中,十四酶型的溶组织内阿米巴比二酶型更常与阿米巴痢疾相关。在非痢疾性腹泻中,侵袭性和非侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴的携带率无显著差异。无症状受试者携带非侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴比侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴更频繁。非阿米巴痢疾患者在被证明感染溶组织内阿米巴时,携带非侵袭性菌株(12%)。
单个粪便标本显微镜检查诊断阿米巴痢疾的敏感性和特异性非常高;通过培养检测到的侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴的肠道携带不一定表明存在活动性疾病,因为腹泻患者和无症状受试者都会排出侵袭性和非侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴。可能存在两种具有不同致病潜力的侵袭性溶组织内阿米巴亚群,可通过酶型分析加以区分。