Faught W E, Mattos M A, van Bemmelen P S, Hodgson K J, Barkmeier L D, Ramsey D E, Sumner D S
Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield 62794-9230.
J Vasc Surg. 1994 May;19(5):818-27; discussion 827-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70006-0.
Duplex scanning has become the standard for noninvasive evaluation of carotid arteries. However, current ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (16% to 49%, 50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) may not be applicable to the categories (30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%) used in ongoing symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. This study was undertaken to determine new velocity criteria consistent with these categories.
From January 1, 1989 through October 30, 1992, 5871 color-flow duplex scans were obtained in our laboratories. After inadequate arteriograms and patients with a contralateral ICA occlusion were excluded, 770 peak systolic velocity (PSV) and 229 end-diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements were available for comparison with arteriography. ICA PSV and EDV were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine optimum criteria for identifying stenoses of 30%, 50%, and 70%.
For 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, PSV greater than 130 plus EDV greater than 100 provided the best sensitivity (81%), specificity (98%), positive predictive value (89%), negative predictive value (96%), and overall accuracy (95%). For 50% to 69% stenosis, a PSV greater than 130 and EDV of 100 or less cm/sec proved to be the best combination: sensitivity (92%), specificity (97%), positive predictive value (93%), negative predictive value (99%), and accuracy (97%). Stenoses in the 30% to 49% range were less accurately identified.
These redefined criteria may prove useful for analyzing duplex ultrasound velocity data in reference to the classification of ICA stenosis used in recent clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy.
双功扫描已成为颈动脉无创评估的标准方法。然而,目前用于评估颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄程度的超声标准(16%至49%、50%至79%、80%至99%)可能不适用于正在进行的有症状和无症状颈动脉内膜切除术试验中所采用的分类(30%至49%、50%至69%、70%至99%)。本研究旨在确定与这些分类相符的新速度标准。
从1989年1月1日至1992年10月30日,我们实验室共获取了5871次彩色血流双功扫描。排除动脉造影不充分以及对侧ICA闭塞的患者后,获得了770次收缩期峰值流速(PSV)和229次舒张末期流速(EDV)测量值,用于与动脉造影进行比较。对ICA的PSV和EDV进行受试者操作特征曲线分析,以确定识别30%、50%和70%狭窄的最佳标准。
对于70%至99%的颈动脉狭窄,PSV大于130且EDV大于100时,具有最佳的敏感性(81%)、特异性(98%)、阳性预测值(89%)、阴性预测值(96%)和总体准确性(95%)。对于50%至69%的狭窄,PSV大于130且EDV为100厘米/秒或更低被证明是最佳组合:敏感性(92%)、特异性(97%)、阳性预测值(93%)、阴性预测值(99%)和准确性(97%)。30%至49%范围内的狭窄识别准确性较低。
这些重新定义的标准可能有助于分析双功超声速度数据,以参考近期颈动脉内膜切除术安全性和有效性临床试验中使用的ICA狭窄分类。