Carpenter J P, Lexa F J, Davis J T
Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Dec;22(6):697-703; discussion 703-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70060-9.
The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, demonstrating the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptom-free patients with 60% or greater carotid artery stenosis, has given rise to the need for development of screening parameters for detection of these lesions. Traditional duplex categories (50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) are not applicable. We sought to develop duplex criteria for determination of 60% or greater carotid artery stenosis by comparison with arteriography.
The duplex scans and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotid arteries), obtained within 1 month of each other, were reviewed by blinded readers. Arteriographic stenosis was determined by the method of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Duplex measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) were recorded, and ratios of velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries (ICA, CCA) were calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy were determined, and receiver-operator characteristic curves were generated.
Interobserver agreement for measurement of arteriographic stenosis was "almost perfect" (kappa = 0.86). The criteria determined for detection of 60% or greater stenosis were as follows: PSVICA > 170 cm/sec (sensitivity 98%, specificity 87%, PPV 88%, NPV 98%, accuracy 92%), EDVICA > 40 cm/sec (sensitivity 97%, specificity 52%, PPV 86%, NPV 86%, accuracy 86%), PSVICA/PSVCCA > 2.0 (sensitivity 97%, specificity 73%, PPV 78%, NPV 96%, accuracy 76%), EDVICA/EDVCCA > 2.4 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, PPV 88%, NPV 100%, accuracy 88%). If all of the above criteria were met, 100% accuracy was achieved.
It is concluded that 60% or greater carotid artery stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex criteria. The use of receiver-operator characteristic curves allows the individualization of duplex criteria appropriate to specific clinical situations of patient screening for lesions (high sensitivity and NPV) or use as a sole preoperative imaging modality (high PPV). Individual vascular laboratories must validate their own results.
无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化研究表明,对于颈动脉狭窄60%及以上的无症状患者,颈动脉内膜切除术有益,这引发了对检测这些病变的筛查参数的需求。传统的双功超声分类(50%至79%,80%至99%)不适用。我们试图通过与动脉造影比较来制定双功超声标准,以确定颈动脉狭窄60%及以上的情况。
由不知情的阅片者对110例患者(210条颈动脉)在彼此相隔1个月内获得的双功超声扫描和动脉造影片进行回顾。动脉造影狭窄程度采用无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化研究的方法确定。记录收缩期峰值流速(PSV)和舒张末期流速(EDV)的双功超声测量值,并计算颈内动脉与颈总动脉(ICA、CCA)的流速比值。确定敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV、NPV)以及准确性,并生成受试者操作特征曲线。
观察者间对动脉造影狭窄测量的一致性“几乎完美”(kappa = 0.86)。确定的检测60%及以上狭窄的标准如下:PSVICA > 170 cm/秒(敏感性98%,特异性87%,PPV 88%,NPV 98%,准确性92%),EDVICA > 40 cm/秒(敏感性97%,特异性52%,PPV 86%,NPV 86%,准确性86%),PSVICA/PSVCCA > 2.0(敏感性97%,特异性73%,PPV 78%,NPV 96%,准确性76%),EDVICA/EDVCCA > 2.4(敏感性100%,特异性80%,PPV 88%,NPV 100%,准确性88%)。如果满足上述所有标准,则准确性可达100%。
得出结论,通过双功超声标准可可靠地确定颈动脉狭窄60%及以上的情况。使用受试者操作特征曲线可使双功超声标准个体化,适用于患者病变筛查的特定临床情况(高敏感性和NPV)或用作唯一的术前成像方式(高PPV)。各个血管实验室必须验证自己的结果。