• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and blood cultures.

作者信息

Mirrett S

机构信息

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Clin Lab Med. 1994 Mar;14(1):171-9.

PMID:8181230
Abstract

Susceptibility testing of microorganisms isolated from blood cultures should follow the guidelines of the NCCLS in the selection of antimicrobial agents and the method for testing. Standardized testing can be performed on isolated colonies from pure subcultures of the blood/broth mixture. Direct susceptibility testing can provide results up to 24 hours sooner, but the techniques for testing have not been standardized. The disk diffusion and agar dilution techniques do not utilize automated testing techniques and seem to provide reliable results. Limited studies of direct susceptibility testing using automated procedures have been published, but the results are not conclusive. The number of discrepancies with direct automated procedures in comparison with standardized techniques is low, and most investigators agree that direct testing is appropriate given the rapidity with which the results are available. New resistance patterns for microorganisms are appearing regularly, and the technology for automated procedures is changing rapidly. New clinical evaluations of direct susceptibility testing with larger numbers of microorganisms that include some of the recently described resistant microorganisms would help to clarify the accuracy and reliability of current procedures. Standardized direct susceptibility testing guidelines should be established so that reliability and accuracy can be improved. There is general consensus that repeat testing by standardized techniques is advisable, although the decision as to whether to repeat the test using a standardized method rests with the individual laboratory director based on his or her expertise and experience with the procedures. Each laboratory director should compare the advantages and limitations of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the methodology currently in use and determine the need for repeat testing by standardized techniques.

摘要

相似文献

1
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and blood cultures.
Clin Lab Med. 1994 Mar;14(1):171-9.
2
CHROMagar Candida medium for direct susceptibility testing of yeast from blood cultures.用于血培养中酵母菌直接药敏试验的科玛嘉念珠菌培养基。
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Apr;43(4):1727-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1727-1731.2005.
3
Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole.幽门螺杆菌对甲硝唑的敏感性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2157-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07681.x.
4
[Mycobacterial tests].[分枝杆菌检测]
Kekkaku. 2008 Jan;83(1):43-59.
5
Evaluation of disc susceptibility tests performed directly from positive blood cultures.直接从阳性血培养物进行的椎间盘药敏试验评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;61(3):343-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2007.050757. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
6
Rapid detection and identification of microorganisms from blood cultures.从血培养物中快速检测和鉴定微生物。
Clin Lab Med. 1994 Mar;14(1):181-95.
7
[Mycoses].[真菌病]
Rinsho Byori. 2002 Sep;50(9):853-9.
8
Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures.使用VITEK 2系统对来自阳性BacT/ALERT血培养的培养液进行快速鉴定和药敏试验。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008 Jun;41(3):259-64.
9
Tentative direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing in urine.
J Urol. 1996 Jul;156(1):149-53.
10
In vitro susceptibility-testing in Aspergillus species.曲霉菌种的体外药敏试验。
Mycoses. 2008 Sep;51(5):437-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01510.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Merlin MICRONAUT system for rapid direct susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures.对Merlin MICRONAUT系统进行评估,用于对来自阳性血培养物的革兰氏阳性球菌和革兰氏阴性杆菌进行快速直接药敏试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):789-95. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01856-06. Epub 2007 Jan 3.
2
Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures.VITEK 2系统用于从阳性血培养物中快速直接鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌及进行药敏试验的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Oct;41(10):4705-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4705-4707.2003.
3
Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli in blood cultures by an electrochemical method.
采用电化学方法对血培养中的革兰氏阴性杆菌进行直接药敏试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Oct;36(10):2882-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.10.2882-2886.1998.
4
Direct susceptibility testing with positive BacT/Alert blood cultures by using MicroScan overnight and rapid panels.使用MicroScan过夜培养板和快速培养板对BacT/Alert血培养阳性标本进行直接药敏试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):2052-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2052-2056.1998.