Waites K B, Brookings E S, Moser S A, Zimmer B L
Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35233, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):2052-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2052-2056.1998.
Studies were conducted on a method of direct inoculation of MicroScan dried overnight and of rapid panels with positive aerobic blood cultures obtained from the BacT/Alert to determine antimicrobial susceptibilities. Inocula were limited to specimens that appeared unimicrobic on Gram stain. Results were compared to those obtained from panels inoculated following subculture. For 133 gram-negative bacilli, there were 94.7 and 93.5% categorical agreements between direct and standard methods for all drugs tested with overnight and rapid panels, respectively. For 104 gram-positive cocci, there were 93.2 and 93.1% categorical agreements for overnight and rapid panels, respectively. The major error (false resistance) rate for gram negatives was 1.4% for overnight versus 0.7% for rapid panels. The very major error (false susceptibility) rate was 2.7% for overnight versus 8.1% for rapid panels. The total error rates were 1.6% for overnight panels and 1.5% for rapid panels. The major error rates for gram-positive direct susceptibility tests were 2.6% for overnight and 2.5% for rapid panels. The very major error rates were 8.8 and 7.2% for overnight and rapid panels, respectively. Total error rates were 3.6% for overnight and rapid gram-positive panels. These findings suggest that susceptibility results obtained from directly inoculated gram-negative overnight panels have the greatest correlation to those obtained by standard methods. When discrepant results occur with direct-susceptibility testing, they are more likely to show false susceptibility than false resistance.
开展了相关研究,以探讨一种直接接种MicroScan过夜干燥板及快速鉴定板的方法,这些板使用从BacT/Alert获得的需氧血培养阳性标本,来确定抗菌药物敏感性。接种物仅限于革兰氏染色显示为单一微生物的标本。将结果与继代培养后接种鉴定板所获得的结果进行比较。对于133株革兰氏阴性杆菌,使用过夜干燥板和快速鉴定板对所有测试药物进行直接法与标准法之间的类别一致性分别为94.7%和93.5%。对于104株革兰氏阳性球菌,使用过夜干燥板和快速鉴定板的类别一致性分别为93.2%和93.1%。革兰氏阴性菌的主要错误(假耐药)率,过夜干燥板为1.4%,快速鉴定板为0.7%。极主要错误(假敏感)率,过夜干燥板为2.7%,快速鉴定板为8.1%。总错误率,过夜干燥板为1.6%,快速鉴定板为1.5%。革兰氏阳性菌直接药敏试验的主要错误率,过夜干燥板为2.6%,快速鉴定板为2.5%。极主要错误率,过夜干燥板为8.8%,快速鉴定板为7.2%。革兰氏阳性过夜干燥板和快速鉴定板的总错误率均为3.6%。这些发现表明,直接接种革兰氏阴性过夜干燥板所获得的药敏结果与标准方法所获得的结果相关性最高。当直接药敏试验出现结果不一致时,更可能表现为假敏感而非假耐药。