Blomberg S, Hallin G, Grann K, Berg E, Sennerby U
Department of Family Medicine, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Mar 1;19(5):569-77. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403000-00013.
Fifty-three acute or subacute patients with low back pain were given standardized but optimized activating conventional treatment by primary health care teams. Forty-eight patients received an experimental treatment that included specific manual treatment, such as manipulation and specific mobilization, muscle stretching, auto-traction, and cortisone injections. After 4 months, the experimental group had a less restricted range of movement in extension, less restricted side-bending to the right and to the left, less local pain caused by extension and side-bending to the right, less pain radiating to the right leg caused by side-bending to the left, and a less positive straight leg raising test (both sides) than the conventionally treated group. Manual treatment was superior to the conventional activating treatment in normalizing pathologic findings on physical examination of the lower back. These results agree with the positive influence on pain, drug consumption, sick-leave, disability rating, and quality of life reported in other reports from the same study.
五十三名患有急性或亚急性腰痛的患者由基层医疗团队给予标准化但优化的激活传统治疗。四十八名患者接受了实验性治疗,包括特定的手法治疗,如整复和特定的松动术、肌肉拉伸、自动牵引以及皮质醇注射。四个月后,与接受传统治疗的组相比,实验组在伸展时的活动范围受限较小,向右侧和左侧侧屈时的受限较小,伸展和向右侧侧屈引起的局部疼痛较少,向左侧侧屈引起的右腿放射性疼痛较少,直腿抬高试验(双侧)阳性程度较低。在使下背部体格检查的病理结果正常化方面,手法治疗优于传统的激活治疗。这些结果与同一研究的其他报告中所报道的对疼痛、药物消耗、病假、残疾评定和生活质量的积极影响一致。