A comparative study on the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy (warfarin versus acenocoumarol).

In our Center for the Surveillance of Anticoagulant Treatment, most of the 1700 patients followed-up are traditionally treated with acenocoumarol, while warfarin is administered nowadays to an increasing proportion of patients. To assess if the difference in the pharmacokinetics of these two drugs may determine a different laboratory quality of treatment, a retrospective study was performed on the computerized files of all 142 patients on treatment with warfarin for more than 100 days and on a control group of 142 patients treated with acenocoumarol, matched for age, sex, disease state and duration of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). The study considered 7071 assays for a total of 432 patient-years of treatment. The overall quality of treatment was significantly better in patients treated with warfarin (72% of controls within the therapeutic range versus 67% on acenocoumarol, p < 0.001). Also the individual quality of therapy, which was assessed as the percentage of patients with 75% or more assays in range, was in favour of warfarin (50.7% vs 34.5%, p < 0.05). Warfarin therapy was more stable and fewer assays were required for treatment monitoring. Confounding factors possibly influencing the treatment stability, such as interfering drugs, diagnostic or therapeutical procedures requiring withdrawal of anticoagulation, were evaluated and no significant difference between the two groups was found. The difference in the laboratory quality of OAT was marked in patients treated for prevention of arterial thromboembolism, while it was negligible in patients with venous thromboembolic disease, whose mean duration of OAT was considerably shorter. Since there is no evidence that acenocoumarol is more efficacious or safer than warfarin, the latter seems to be preferable for patients who are candidate to very prolonged OAT.