Suppr超能文献

肝硬化中局灶性肝病变诊断的细针穿刺检查评估

The evaluation of fine-needle procedures for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions in cirrhosis.

作者信息

Borzio M, Borzio F, Macchi R, Croce A M, Bruno S, Ferrari A, Servida E

机构信息

First Department of Medicine, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 1994 Jan;20(1):117-21. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80477-5.

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration, fine-needle biopsy and extranodular fine needle biopsy in identifying focal lesions in cirrhosis, 100 consecutive ultrasound detected nodules were studied. Seventy-three were hepatocellular carcinomas (31 were well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas), 23 were benign lesions (one angioma and 22 large regenerative nodules) and two were metastases. The lesions were divided according to maximum diameter as follows: < 20 mm in 36, > 20 < 30 mm in 27, and > 30 mm in 33. In four cases there were multiple nodules of different sizes. Fine needle aspiration, intranodular fine needle biopsy and extranodular fine needle biopsy were obtained in each lesion. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of each procedure were evaluated separately by three independent pathologists. Seven fine needle aspirations and three intranodular fine needle biopsies were considered inadequate. The highest diagnostic accuracy (96%) was obtained by the combined analysis of fine needle aspiration plus intranodular and extranodular fine needle biopsy, and this superiority was confirmed in each group of lesions. Fine needle aspiration showed a lower accuracy (48%) than intranodular fine needle biopsy (67%). When fine needle aspiration and intranodular fine needle biopsy were evaluated together, an accuracy of 91% was found. Intralesional fine needle biopsy plus extranodular fine needle biopsy analysis gave an accuracy of 78% and, particularly relevant, a specificity of 95%. These results indicate that, in patients with cirrhosis with nodular lesions < 30 mm, fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration and that the combined evaluation of fine needle aspiration plus intranodular and extranodular fine needle biopsy is the most accurate approach.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为评估细针穿刺抽吸、细针活检及结节外细针活检在鉴别肝硬化局灶性病变中的诊断准确性,对连续100个超声检测出的结节进行了研究。其中73个为肝细胞癌(31个为高分化肝细胞癌),23个为良性病变(1个血管瘤和22个大再生结节),2个为转移瘤。根据最大直径将病变分为以下几类:36个直径<20mm,27个直径>20<30mm,33个直径>30mm。4例存在不同大小的多个结节。对每个病变均进行了细针穿刺抽吸、结节内细针活检及结节外细针活检。由三名独立病理学家分别评估每种检查方法的敏感性、特异性及诊断准确性。7次细针穿刺抽吸和3次结节内细针活检被认为不充分。细针穿刺抽吸联合结节内及结节外细针活检的联合分析获得了最高的诊断准确性(96%),且在每组病变中均证实了这种优势。细针穿刺抽吸的准确性(48%)低于结节内细针活检(67%)。当同时评估细针穿刺抽吸和结节内细针活检时,准确性为91%。结节内细针活检加结节外细针活检分析的准确性为78%,特别值得注意的是,其特异性为95%。这些结果表明,在肝硬化伴有直径<30mm结节性病变的患者中,细针活检优于细针穿刺抽吸,且细针穿刺抽吸联合结节内及结节外细针活检的联合评估是最准确的方法。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验