Suppr超能文献

预防性(每月一次)克霉唑与经验性自我治疗在复发性阴道念珠菌病中的价值。

The value of prophylactic (monthly) clotrimazole versus empiric self-treatment in recurrent vaginal candidiasis.

作者信息

Fong I W

机构信息

Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Genitourin Med. 1994 Apr;70(2):124-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.70.2.124.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the comparative efficacy and cost benefit of prophylactic monthly (perimenstrual) clotrimazole, versus empiric self-treatment with the same agent at the onset of symptoms in recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, open cross-over study of women with proven recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clinical and microbiological assessments were done every two months for 12 months.

SETTING

Women's Clinic of a University Teaching Hospital.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-three otherwise healthy, non-pregnant women with greater than four proven episodes of candida vaginitis in the last year were enrolled into the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to receive: (1) a single dose of prophylactic clotrimazole 500 mg ovule just before or on the last day of the menses each month for 6 months; (2) or a single dose of clotrimazole 500 mg ovule empirically at the onset of symptoms for 6 months. After the first 6 months patients were crossed-over to the opposite regimen.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Symptoms of recurrent vulvovaginitis during each period, and number of clotrimazole ovules used for each 6 month period. The personal preference of the patients for the two different regimens were assessed at the end of study.

RESULTS

During the prophylactic 6 months period of the study, 23 patients had 50 episodes of symptomatic vaginitis (mean 2.2 episodes per patient), versus 86 episodes (mean 3.7 episodes/patient) during the empiric self-treatment 6 months period (P = 0.05). However, during the prophylactic period a total of 168 clotrimazole ovules were used (mean 7.3 per patient), versus 84 ovules (mean 3.6 per patient) during the empiric self-treatment period, p < 0.001. The personal preference of the patients for the type of regimen employed were 17 (73.9%) in favour of the empirical treatment, versus 4 (17.4%) in favour of the prophylactic treatment and 2 (8.7%) no personal preference, p < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

Empiric self-treatment is more cost-effective and preferable to patients than cyclical monthly prophylactic use of 500 mg clotrimazole vaginal ovules.

摘要

目的

确定每月(经前期)预防性使用克霉唑与复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病症状出现时使用同一药物进行经验性自我治疗的比较疗效和成本效益。

设计

对确诊为复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病的女性进行前瞻性、随机、开放交叉研究。每两个月进行一次临床和微生物学评估,为期12个月。

地点

大学教学医院的妇科诊所。

研究对象

23名健康、未怀孕且去年有超过4次确诊念珠菌性阴道炎发作的女性被纳入研究。

干预措施

患者被随机分为两组:(1)在每个月月经前或月经最后一天单次预防性使用500mg克霉唑栓剂,持续6个月;(2)或在症状出现时经验性单次使用500mg克霉唑栓剂,持续6个月。前6个月后,患者交叉使用相反的治疗方案。

主要观察指标

每个时期复发性外阴阴道念珠菌病的症状,以及每个6个月期间使用的克霉唑栓剂数量。在研究结束时评估患者对两种不同治疗方案的个人偏好。

结果

在研究的预防性6个月期间,23名患者出现50次有症状的阴道炎发作(平均每名患者2.2次发作),而在经验性自我治疗的6个月期间为86次发作(平均每名患者3.7次发作)(P = 0.05)。然而,在预防期间共使用了168枚克霉唑栓剂(平均每名患者7.3枚),而在经验性自我治疗期间为84枚(平均每名患者3.6枚),p < 0.001。患者对所采用治疗方案类型的个人偏好为,17名(73.9%)倾向于经验性治疗,4名(17.4%)倾向于预防性治疗,2名(8.7%)无个人偏好,p < 0.01。

结论

经验性自我治疗比每月周期性预防性使用500mg克霉唑阴道栓剂更具成本效益,且更受患者青睐。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验