Suppr超能文献

双能X线吸收测定法:扇束扫描与笔束扫描的比较

Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.

作者信息

Blake G M, Parker J C, Buxton F M, Fogelman I

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 1993 Oct;66(790):902-6. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-790-902.

Abstract

The recent introduction of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems with fan beam instead of conventional pencil beam scanning geometry represents a significant technical advance in bone densitometry. This report describes phantom and in-vivo studies of the effect of the change in beam configuration on DXA measurements. Fan beam and pencil beam measurements acquired on one of the new generation scanners, the Hologic QDR-2000, were compared with scans performed on an earlier pencil beam model, the Hologic QDR-1000. The variation with height above the scanning table of fan beam measurements of an anthropomorphic spine phantom were: bone mineral content (BMC): -3.1% cm-1; projected area (AREA): -2.8% cm-1; bone mineral density (BMD): -0.2% cm-1. For pencil beam scans the magnitude of height variation was less than 0.1% cm-1. QDR-2000 fan and pencil beam scan results for 20 volunteers correlated closely with QDR-1000 pencil beam data (r = 0.966-0.998). For BMD measurements on the spine and hip, differences between fan and pencil beam data were consistent with the errors expected from measurement precision. For AREA and BMC data, however, larger differences were observed with individual deviations which correlated with body habitus of the subjects. Although the change from pencil to fan beam geometry significantly affected AREA and BMC data, the effect on the clinically more important BMD measurements was negligibly small.

摘要

近期引入的采用扇形束而非传统笔形束扫描几何结构的双能X线吸收法(DXA)系统,代表了骨密度测定技术的一项重大进展。本报告描述了关于束配置变化对DXA测量结果影响的体模和体内研究。在新一代扫描仪之一Hologic QDR - 2000上进行的扇形束和笔形束测量,与在早期笔形束型号Hologic QDR - 1000上进行的扫描进行了比较。对一个拟人化脊柱体模进行扇形束测量时,其测量值随扫描台上方高度的变化情况如下:骨矿物质含量(BMC):-3.1%/厘米;投影面积(AREA):-2.8%/厘米;骨矿物质密度(BMD):-0.2%/厘米。对于笔形束扫描,高度变化幅度小于0.1%/厘米。20名志愿者的QDR - 2000扇形束和笔形束扫描结果与QDR - 1000笔形束数据密切相关(r = 0.966 - 0.998)。对于脊柱和髋部的BMD测量,扇形束和笔形束数据之间的差异与测量精度预期的误差一致。然而,对于AREA和BMC数据,观察到的个体偏差差异更大,且与受试者的体型相关。尽管从笔形束到扇形束几何结构的变化显著影响了AREA和BMC数据,但对临床上更重要的BMD测量的影响小到可以忽略不计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验