Faulkner K G, Glüer C C, Estilo M, Genant H K
Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco 94143.
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Feb;52(2):79-84. doi: 10.1007/BF00308312.
In this study, the cross-calibration of a fan beam DXA system (Hologic QDR-2000) to a pencil beam scanner from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR-1000/W) is described. The scanners were calibrated by the manufacturer using the same anthropomorphic spine phantom at installation. To verify consistent machine calibration, a group of 69 female subjects, aged 46-75, had anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur scans on the QDR-1000/W followed by pencil and array scans of the same sites on the QDR-2000 during the same visit. Many of the subjects had bilateral examinations of the proximal femur for a total of 123 hip scans. Pencil and array area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) from the QDR-2000 were compared with the values obtained on the QDR-1000/W, and linear regression equations were derived for relating the two instruments. At the spine, no differences were found between the QDR-1000/W BMD values and the QDR-2000 array BMD values. A slight difference between pencil beam modes was detected but was not deemed clinically significant. Linear regression models relating the QDR-2000 and QDR-1000/W AP spine BMD measurements showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.99, with slopes of 1.00, intercepts equivalent to zero, and small root mean square errors. Comparisons at the proximal femur showed equivalency at the femoral neck and trochanter regions for the two machines in pencil mode, but slight increases in BMC and BMD at the other femoral sites on the QDR-2000 in both pencil and array mode. Correlation coefficients were 0.97-0.99 for all measurement regions except for Ward's.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在本研究中,描述了扇形束双能X线吸收仪系统(Hologic QDR - 2000)与同一制造商生产的笔形束扫描仪(Hologic QDR - 1000/W)之间的交叉校准。这些扫描仪在安装时由制造商使用相同的人体脊柱模型进行校准。为验证机器校准的一致性,一组69名年龄在46 - 75岁的女性受试者在QDR - 1000/W上进行了前后位(AP)脊柱和近端股骨扫描,随后在同一次就诊期间在QDR - 2000上对相同部位进行了笔形束和阵列扫描。许多受试者对近端股骨进行了双侧检查,共进行了123次髋部扫描。将QDR - 2000的笔形束和阵列面积、骨矿物质含量(BMC)以及骨矿物质密度(BMD)与在QDR - 1000/W上获得的值进行比较,并推导了用于关联这两种仪器的线性回归方程。在脊柱部位,QDR - 1000/W的BMD值与QDR - 2000阵列BMD值之间未发现差异。检测到笔形束模式之间存在轻微差异,但不认为具有临床意义。关联QDR - 2000和QDR - 1000/W AP脊柱BMD测量值的线性回归模型显示相关系数大于0.99,斜率为1.00,截距等于零,且均方根误差较小。在近端股骨处的比较表明,在笔形束模式下,两台机器在股骨颈和大转子区域相当,但在QDR - 2000上,笔形束和阵列模式下其他股骨部位的BMC和BMD均略有增加。除了沃德三角区外,所有测量区域的相关系数为0.97 - 0.99。(摘要截断于250字)