Eiken P, Kolthoff N, Bärenholdt O, Hermansen F, Pors Nielsen S
Department of Clinical Physiology, Hillerød Hospital, Denmark.
Bone. 1994 Nov-Dec;15(6):671-6. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90316-6.
Switching from the Hologic QDR-1000/W to the QDR-2000 DXA densitometer was critically evaluated with regard to cross-calibration and dosimetry. Studies with bone equivalent humanoid spine phantoms and patient studies were done. Fan-beam scanning with the QDR-2000 is problematic because of magnification. Mean phantom bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) were moderately but significantly different. Biological variation disguised differences between the two devices in humans, but significant differences were revealed when individual data were analyzed. Longitudinal assessments of BMC and BMD, initiated with QDR-1000/W and continued with the QDR-2000, should employ single-beam mode only and not fan-beam mode--but even if that is done, significant errors can be introduced. The new QDR-2000 should be properly cross-calibrated with the original densitometer, and one should make sure that the same software, phantom, and type of collimator are used. The radiation dose is substantially higher with QDR-2000 (fan-beam and high-resolution array mode) than with QDR-1000/W (pencil-beam mode) and QDR-2000 (pencil-beam mode), and higher than claimed by the manufacturer. The typical radiation dose given by the manufacturer was half the actual radiation dose measured (e.g., for fan-beam scan 62 microSv versus 33 microSv). High-resolution array mode does not improve precision, but augments the radiation dose to the patient.
