Pollock M, Roa J, Benditt J, Celli B
Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine.
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1378-83. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1378.
Clinicians and surgeons have used the subjective response to the climb of "one or two flights of stairs" to assess the "reserve" of patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO). Very little objective data exist regarding the metabolic and ventilatory cost for any level of stair climbing in these patients. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the use of symptom-limited stair climbing as a simple method to estimate the peak oxygen uptake (VO2) and minute ventilation (VE) in patients with CAO. We studied 31 men with varying degrees of CAO, who climbed stairs until they stopped at their symptom-limited maximum. During this climb, timed expired gas was intermittently collected and analyzed, and oxygen saturation and heart and respiratory rates were recorded. The patients achieved 81 +/- 14 percent of their predicted maximal heart rate and 90 +/- 27 percent of their predicted maximal VE. The number of steps or flights climbed correlated linearly with peak VO2 (r = 0.72, p < 0.01) and with VE (r = 0.7, p < 0.01). Stair climbing peak VE, VO2, heart and respiratory rate correlated well with those achieved during standard leg cycle ergometry. The mean +/- SD number of flights climbed was 4.2 +/- 1.7 with most patients (87%) reaching at least 3 flights (54 steps). The group of eight patients with very severe CAO (FEV1 < 0.9 L) climbed 3.4 +/- 0.9 flights (61 +/- 16 steps). We conclude that a symptom-limited maximal stair climb helps estimate peak VO2 and VE in patients with CAO. The frequently advocated test to climb one to two flights to evaluate cardiopulmonary reserve is not adequate for most patients with CAO. Symptom-limited maximal stair climbing is a simple, inexpensive and readily available test that may be used to evaluate the cardiopulmonary reserve of stable patients with CAO.
临床医生和外科医生一直通过患者对攀爬“一两层楼梯”的主观反应来评估慢性气流阻塞(CAO)患者的“储备能力”。关于这些患者在任何攀爬楼梯水平下的代谢和通气成本,客观数据非常少。因此,本研究旨在评估以症状限制的楼梯攀爬作为一种简单方法来估计CAO患者的峰值摄氧量(VO2)和分钟通气量(VE)。我们研究了31名不同程度CAO的男性患者,他们攀爬楼梯直至因症状限制而达到最大运动量。在攀爬过程中,间歇性收集并分析定时呼出气体,并记录血氧饱和度、心率和呼吸频率。患者达到了预测最大心率的81±14%和预测最大VE的90±27%。攀爬的步数或层数与峰值VO2(r = 0.72,p < 0.01)和VE(r = 0.7,p < 0.01)呈线性相关。楼梯攀爬的峰值VE、VO2、心率和呼吸频率与标准腿部周期测力计测试中获得的结果相关性良好。攀爬的平均层数±标准差为4.2±1.7,大多数患者(87%)至少爬了3层(54步)。8名非常严重CAO(FEV1 < 0.9 L)的患者组爬了3.4±0.9层(61±16步)。我们得出结论:症状限制的最大楼梯攀爬有助于估计CAO患者的峰值VO2和VE。经常提倡的攀爬一两层来评估心肺储备的测试对大多数CAO患者来说并不足够。症状限制的最大楼梯攀爬是一种简单、廉价且易于实施的测试,可用于评估稳定的CAO患者的心肺储备。