Aman M G, Kern R A, McGhee D E, Arnold L E
Ohio State University.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Sep;23(3):491-506. doi: 10.1007/BF01046052.
Twenty-eight children took part in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of fenfluramine and methylphenidate. Fenfluramine dosage was gradually increased to a standardized dose of 1.5 mg/kg per day, whereas methylphenidate was given in doses of 0.4 mg/kg per day. The children were assessed on laboratory tests of selective and sustained attention, visual matching, and color matching, during which seat activity was monitored automatically. Results showed fenfluramine to be superior to placebo on the memory task, whereas methylphenidate reduced commission errors on a continuous performance test. Methylphenidate caused shorter response times, and fenfluramine caused increases, on two of the tests. Examiner behavior ratings indicated significant improvements with both drugs on the domains of attention, activity level, and mood. These findings, together with those from a companion clinical study, suggest that the drugs may have contrasting mechanisms of action, but both appear to have useful clinical effects in these children.
28名儿童参与了一项关于芬氟拉明和哌醋甲酯的双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。芬氟拉明剂量逐渐增加至标准剂量每日1.5毫克/千克,而哌醋甲酯剂量为每日0.4毫克/千克。通过选择性和持续性注意力、视觉匹配及颜色匹配的实验室测试对儿童进行评估,在此期间自动监测就座活动。结果显示,在记忆任务中芬氟拉明优于安慰剂,而哌醋甲酯在连续执行测试中减少了 commission errors(此处可能有误,原文有误的话暂无法准确翻译该词)。在两项测试中,哌醋甲酯使反应时间缩短,芬氟拉明则使反应时间增加。考官行为评分表明,两种药物在注意力、活动水平和情绪方面均有显著改善。这些发现,连同来自一项配套临床研究的结果,表明这两种药物可能具有截然不同的作用机制,但在这些儿童中似乎都有有益的临床效果。