Rispler-Chaim V
University of Haifa, Israel.
J Med Ethics. 1993 Sep;19(3):164-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.3.164.
Postmortem examinations have recently become common practice in Western medicine: they are used to verify the cause of death and to obtain additional scientific information on certain diseases, as well as to train medical students. For religious people of the monotheistic faiths postmortems present several ethical questions even though the advantages attributed to postmortems in the West are also acknowledged by Jews, Christians and Muslims. The Islamic way of dealing with such questions will be surveyed via contemporary fatawa (legal opinions) issued primarily by Egyptian scholars; Islamic law, which was formulated in the eighth to ninth centuries, did not speak of postmortems. I will therefore depict the means whereby contemporary scholars approach postmortems in the absence of clear legal reference. The difficulties that postmortems create for Muslims at present will be weighed against some shar i instructions which may help circumvent them. While the ethical and religious debate continues, postmortems seem to be accepted but not, however, without certain reservations.
它们被用于核实死因、获取有关某些疾病的更多科学信息以及培训医学生。对于一神论宗教的信徒而言,尸体解剖引发了若干伦理问题,尽管西方赋予尸体解剖的优势也得到了犹太教徒、基督教徒和穆斯林的认可。将通过主要由埃及学者发布的当代法特瓦(法律意见)来审视伊斯兰教处理此类问题的方式;在8至9世纪制定的伊斯兰法并未提及尸体解剖。因此,我将描述当代学者在缺乏明确法律参考的情况下处理尸体解剖的方法。将权衡尸体解剖目前给穆斯林带来的困难与一些有助于规避这些困难的教法指示。虽然伦理和宗教辩论仍在继续,但尸体解剖似乎已被接受,不过并非毫无保留。