• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄时的瓣口面积与心输出量:通过磁共振速度成像进行量化

Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping.

作者信息

Søndergaard L, Hildebrandt P, Lindvig K, Thomsen C, Ståhlberg F, Kassis E, Henriksen O

机构信息

Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1993 Nov;126(5):1156-64. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90669-z.

DOI:10.1016/0002-8703(93)90669-z
PMID:8237760
Abstract

Valve area and cardiac output were determined with magnetic resonance (MR) velocity mapping in 12 patients with aortic stenosis. Heart catheterization, Doppler echocardiography, and indicator dilution were performed for comparison. Left ventricle could be catheterized in only nine patients; in these cases, MR measured a mean valve area of 1.2 cm2 compared with 0.9 cm2 derived from catheterization data, with a mean difference of 0.2 cm2 between the 2 methods. The limits of agreement were [0.0, +0.5] cm2, less in patients with an important degree of concomitant regurgitation. In the whole material, MR measured a mean area of 1.1 cm2 compared with 1.2 cm2 derived from Doppler echocardiography data, with a mean difference of 0.1 cm2 and [-0.5, +0.6] cm2 as limits of agreement. In 11 patients the cardiac output was quantified by MR to a mean of 4.9 L/min and by indicator dilution to 5.0 L/min, with a mean difference of 0.2 L/min, and [-0.6, +0.8] L/min as limits of agreement. In addition, MR offers the major advance of simultaneous quantification of regurgitant volume in cases of concomitant regurgitation. In conclusion, because the two important prognostic determinants in aortic stenosis--the valvular area and the cardiac output--may be quantified, MR has potential to become a clinical tool in assessment of severity in aortic stenosis.

摘要

对12例主动脉瓣狭窄患者采用磁共振(MR)速度成像测定瓣膜面积和心输出量。同时进行心导管检查、多普勒超声心动图检查和指示剂稀释法检查以作比较。仅9例患者能够进行左心室导管插入术;在这些病例中,MR测量的平均瓣膜面积为1.2平方厘米,而根据导管插入术数据得出的面积为0.9平方厘米,两种方法的平均差值为0.2平方厘米。一致性界限为[0.0, +0.5]平方厘米,在伴有严重程度反流的患者中该数值更低。在全部病例中,MR测量的平均面积为1.1平方厘米,而根据多普勒超声心动图数据得出的面积为1.2平方厘米,平均差值为0.1平方厘米,一致性界限为[-0.5, +0.6]平方厘米。11例患者的心输出量通过MR测定平均为4.9升/分钟,通过指示剂稀释法测定为5.0升/分钟,平均差值为0.2升/分钟,一致性界限为[-0.6, +0.8]升/分钟。此外,MR的主要优势在于能够同时对伴有反流的病例中的反流容积进行量化。总之,由于主动脉瓣狭窄的两个重要预后决定因素——瓣膜面积和心输出量——可以被量化,MR有潜力成为评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的临床工具。

相似文献

1
Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping.主动脉瓣狭窄时的瓣口面积与心输出量:通过磁共振速度成像进行量化
Am Heart J. 1993 Nov;126(5):1156-64. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90669-z.
2
Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry.接受主动脉或二尖瓣球囊瓣膜成形术的成人患者狭窄严重程度临床评估中的方法学问题。美国国立心肺血液研究所球囊瓣膜成形术登记处。
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jun 15;69(19):1607-16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90712-8.
3
Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.根据 Gorlin 公式和多普勒超声心动图连续性方程得出的主动脉瓣面积差异:与瓣膜性主动脉狭窄患者血流的关系
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Aug;16(8):985-92.
4
Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.低心输出量患者中评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的新旧多普勒超声心动图指标的可靠性
Ital Heart J. 2002 Apr;3(4):248-55.
5
Quantification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis using a hybrid approach combining Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution.使用结合多普勒超声心动图和热稀释法的混合方法对低梯度严重主动脉瓣狭窄进行定量分析。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 May;23(3):271-8.
6
[Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].[使用多普勒超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度进行无创定量和分类]
Z Kardiol. 1992 Nov;81(11):619-26.
7
Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣压力阶差:采用速度编码电影磁共振成像进行量化分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 May;160(5):971-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.5.8470612.
8
Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography.使用多普勒超声心动图测定成人主动脉瓣狭窄面积
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar;7(3):509-17. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80460-0.
9
Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.运动期间主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度测量的血流依赖性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 1;24(5):1342-50. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90118-x.
10
Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患儿主动脉瓣面积的多普勒评估
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;18(6):1499-505. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90681-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic Valve Area and Strain Measurements by Cardiac MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Severe Aortic Stenosis with Normal Left Ventricular Function.心脏 MRI 和经胸超声心动图在左心室功能正常的重度主动脉瓣狭窄中的主动脉瓣口面积和应变测量。
Iran J Med Sci. 2023 Jul;48(4):370-378. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.94552.2590.
2
Pulmonary Valve Stenosis: From Diagnosis to Current Management Techniques and Future Prospects.肺动脉瓣狭窄:从诊断到当前的治疗技术和未来展望。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023 Jun 30;19:379-390. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S380240. eCollection 2023.
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Cardiovascular Effects of Cancer Therapy: State-of-the-Art Review.
磁共振成像检测癌症治疗的心血管效应:最新综述
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Jun 16;2(2):270-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.04.011. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Estimating the Haemodynamic Streamline Vena Contracta as the Effective Orifice Area Measured from Reconstructed Multislice Phase-contrast MR Images for Patients with Moderately Accelerated Aortic Stenosis.估算中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者重建多层相位对比 MR 图像测量的血流束截面积作为有效瓣口面积。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Oct 1;21(4):569-582. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0001. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and monitoring of cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer after treatment: a comprehensive review.心脏磁共振成像在乳腺癌患者治疗后心脏毒性检测与监测中的作用:一项综述
Heart Fail Rev. 2021 May;26(3):679-697. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-10028-y. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄的临床评估:4D 流动磁共振成像与经胸超声心动图的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Feb;51(2):472-480. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26847. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
7
Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度分级:心脏磁共振成像与超声心动图的头对头比较。
Radiol Med. 2018 Sep;123(9):643-654. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0895-2. Epub 2018 May 5.
8
Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.使用4D流动磁共振成像进行峰值血流速度容积评估的高效方法。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Dec;44(6):1673-1682. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25305. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
MRI Assessment of Diastolic and Systolic Intraventricular Pressure Gradients in Heart Failure.心力衰竭时舒张期和收缩期心室内压力梯度的MRI评估
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016 Feb;13(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s11897-016-0281-0.
10
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.心血管磁共振相位对比成像
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 9;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0172-7.