Suppr超能文献

裂解离心血培养法在检测经组织证实的侵袭性念珠菌病中的应用。播散性感染与单器官感染的比较。

Lysis-centrifugation blood cultures in the detection of tissue-proven invasive candidiasis. Disseminated versus single-organ infection.

作者信息

Berenguer J, Buck M, Witebsky F, Stock F, Pizzo P A, Walsh T J

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Aug-Sep;17(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90020-8.

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated significantly higher frequency and more rapid detection of candidemia with blood culture methods performed by lysis-centrifugation (LC) in comparison with other techniques. Little is known, however, about the ability of LC blood culture methods to detect tissue-proven invasive candidiasis. We therefore investigated the sensitivity of LC blood cultures in the detection of tissue-proven invasive candidiasis. Between 1985 and 1991, invasive candidiasis was detected in 41 (5.1%) of 803 autopsies at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA). Cases were classified as single-organ (SO) candidiasis (n = 20) and as disseminated candidiasis (DI) (n = 21). Patients with DI were more likely than those with SO to have a hematologic malignancy (71% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and to have gastrointestinal mucosal candidiasis (76% vs 25%, P = 0.003). LC detected fungemia in 16 (43%) of all 37 cases with blood cultures. When analyzed by classification, Candida spp. were isolated from blood in 11 (58%) of 19 patients with DI and in five (28%) of 18 patients with SO (P = 0.13). When analyzed by number of organs infected, blood cultures were positive in seven (78%) of nine patients with > 3 organs infected by Candida in comparison to five (28%) of 18 patients with one organ infected (P = 0.024). The mean recovery time for Candida in blood cultures was 2.6 days in DI and 3.2 days in SO (P = 0.017). There was no difference in colonies of organisms per LC tube between patients with DI and those with SO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

多项研究表明,与其他技术相比,采用裂解离心法(LC)进行血培养检测念珠菌血症的频率显著更高,且检测速度更快。然而,关于LC血培养方法检测经组织证实的侵袭性念珠菌病的能力,人们所知甚少。因此,我们调查了LC血培养在检测经组织证实的侵袭性念珠菌病方面的敏感性。1985年至1991年期间,在美国国立卫生研究院临床中心(马里兰州贝塞斯达)对803例尸检进行检查,发现41例(5.1%)患有侵袭性念珠菌病。病例分为单器官(SO)念珠菌病(n = 20)和播散性念珠菌病(DI)(n = 21)。DI患者比SO患者更有可能患有血液系统恶性肿瘤(71%对15%,P < 0.001)以及胃肠道黏膜念珠菌病(76%对25%,P = 0.003)。在所有37例进行血培养的病例中,LC检测到真菌血症16例(43%)。按分类分析时,19例DI患者中有11例(58%)血中分离出念珠菌属,18例SO患者中有5例(28%)血中分离出念珠菌属(P = 0.13)。按感染器官数量分析时,9例念珠菌感染超过3个器官的患者中有7例(78%)血培养呈阳性,而18例仅一个器官感染的患者中有5例(28%)血培养呈阳性(P = 0.024)。血培养中念珠菌的平均恢复时间,DI患者为2.6天,SO患者为3.2天(P = 0.017)。DI患者与SO患者每管LC培养物中的菌落数无差异。(摘要截取自250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验