Chiarioni G, Scattolini C, Bonfante F, Vantini I
Division of Gastroenterology at Valeggio sul Mincio, University of Verona, Italy.
Gut. 1993 Nov;34(11):1576-80. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.11.1576.
The motor and sensory function of the anorectum is well characterised in patients with solid stool incontinence. Fewer data are available in the case of liquid stool incontinence. Anorectal sensorimotor function was studied in 16 patients with liquid stool incontinence and severe urgency (10 with diarrhoea) unresponsive to conventional medical treatment, and in 16 healthy volunteers. The only significant difference found between incontinent patients and controls was a reduction in squeeze duration (p < 0.0001). Fourteen patients were selected to receive biofeedback treatment. Treatment was associated with a substantial improvement in continence in 12 patients and with a significant decrease in urgency (p < 0.05). Bowel frequency was not significantly influenced. Most patients showed a persistent improvement in anal motor function. Functional parameters were not predictive of outcome of treatment; the poor responders showed major psychological problems. In conclusion, an anal motor deficit is often present in disabling liquid stool incontinence. Biofeedback may improve anal continence in 75% of patients.
在固体粪便失禁患者中,肛门直肠的运动和感觉功能已得到充分描述。而关于液体粪便失禁患者的数据则较少。对16例液体粪便失禁且伴有严重便急(其中10例有腹泻)、对传统药物治疗无效的患者,以及16名健康志愿者的肛门直肠感觉运动功能进行了研究。失禁患者与对照组之间唯一显著的差异是挤压持续时间缩短(p < 0.0001)。选择了14例患者接受生物反馈治疗。治疗使12例患者的控便能力有显著改善,便急情况显著减轻(p < 0.05)。排便频率未受到显著影响。大多数患者的肛门运动功能持续改善。功能参数无法预测治疗结果;治疗效果不佳的患者存在严重的心理问题。总之,失能性液体粪便失禁患者常存在肛门运动功能缺陷。生物反馈治疗可使75%的患者肛门控便能力得到改善。