Boldt J, Hammermann H
Abteilung Anaesthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.
Anaesthesist. 1993 Oct;42(10):733-52.
The introduction of the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter in routine practice by Swan and Ganz at the beginning of the 1970s has enhanced our understanding of the mechanisms of patients' decompensation and has helped to guide appropriate therapeutic interventions in many diseases. Everybody who uses this monitoring instrument should become familiar with its technical concepts and theoretical basis. Modern technology has provided a large number of sophisticated developments, particularly in the past decade. Today we are able to obtain a huge mass of haemodynamic and oxymetric data in the critically ill. It is a common misconception in clinical practice that PA catheters should be employed for documentation of the haemodynamic catastrophe; however, it should be used to avoid significant haemodynamic problems. In recent years the value of PA catheter monitoring has been called into question. Whether a monitoring device can improve 'outcome' may be doubted. Although some opponents of haemodynamic monitoring wish to turn back the clock to the old days of a 'finger on the pulse', there is no doubt that the use of the PA catheter may yield additional information or that some of this information may be useful when the data are interpreted carefully. The time has come not only to criticize this monitoring instrument, but to examine future perspectives and visions.
20世纪70年代初,斯旺和甘兹将肺动脉(PA)导管引入常规临床实践,这增进了我们对患者失代偿机制的理解,并有助于指导多种疾病的适当治疗干预。每个使用这种监测仪器的人都应该熟悉其技术概念和理论基础。现代技术带来了大量先进的发展,尤其是在过去十年。如今,我们能够在危重症患者中获取大量的血流动力学和血氧测定数据。在临床实践中,一个常见的误解是肺动脉导管应用于记录血流动力学灾难;然而,它应该用于避免严重的血流动力学问题。近年来,肺动脉导管监测的价值受到了质疑。一种监测设备是否能改善“预后”可能令人怀疑。尽管一些血流动力学监测的反对者希望回到过去仅凭“手指搭脉”的时代,但毫无疑问,使用肺动脉导管可能会产生额外信息,而且当仔细解读这些数据时,其中一些信息可能会有用。现在不仅是批评这种监测仪器的时候了,也是审视未来前景和愿景的时候了。