• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型血液分析仪Cobas Argos 5 Diff的简要评估

A short evaluation of a new haematological analyser: the Cobas Argos 5 Diff.

作者信息

Bas B M, Catsberg M J, op de Kamp S L

机构信息

Afdeling Hematologie, Maasland Ziekenhuis, Sittard, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1993 Sep;31(9):603-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1993.31.9.603.

DOI:10.1515/cclm.1993.31.9.603
PMID:8260533
Abstract

In order to evaluate the Cobas Argos 5 Diff, a five-part differential haematological analyser, we performed a comparative study using our current analyser, the Toa E-5000, and the manual leukocyte differential. Samples (n = 593) were collected from various departments in our hospital and were tested on both Cobas Argos 5 Diff and Toa E-5000. Regression lines were calculated for all standard haematological quantities. A group of 100 samples, including 50 negative (absence of flags) and 50 positive (presence of flags), on the Cobas Argos 5 Diff were randomly selected from the above-mentioned collection. All these samples had been checked under the microscope by two persons counting 200 cells each. The comparison of standard haematological quantities between Cobas Argos 5 Diff and the Toa E-5000 shows good correlation: Red Blood Cells r = 0.993; White Blood Cells r = 0.998; Haemoglobin r = 0.989; Haematocrit r = 0.982; Thrombocytes r = 0.988; Lymphocytes (%) r = 0.983; Neutrophils (%) r = 0.959. The correlation between Cobas Argos 5 Diff and the manual leukocyte differential shows good correlation for lymphocytes and neutrophils, with acceptable correlation for eosinophils. The correlation for basophils and monocytes was less acceptable, especially for normal samples. We conclude that the efficiency of the Cobas Argos 5 Diff is good (93%) and that it is a suitable haematological cell analyser.

摘要

为了评估五分类血液分析仪Cobas Argos 5 Diff,我们使用我们现有的分析仪Toa E - 5000和手工白细胞分类法进行了一项对比研究。从我院各个科室收集了593份样本,并在Cobas Argos 5 Diff和Toa E - 5000上进行检测。计算了所有标准血液学指标的回归线。从上述样本中随机选取100份在Cobas Argos 5 Diff上检测的样本,其中50份为阴性(无警示标记),50份为阳性(有警示标记)。所有这些样本均由两人在显微镜下各计数200个细胞进行检查。Cobas Argos 5 Diff与Toa E - 5000之间标准血液学指标的比较显示出良好的相关性:红细胞r = 0.993;白细胞r = 0.998;血红蛋白r = 0.989;血细胞比容r = 0.982;血小板r = 0.988;淋巴细胞(%)r = 0.983;中性粒细胞(%)r = 0.959。Cobas Argos 5 Diff与手工白细胞分类法之间,淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞显示出良好的相关性,嗜酸性粒细胞的相关性尚可接受。嗜碱性粒细胞和单核细胞的相关性不太理想,尤其是对于正常样本。我们得出结论,Cobas Argos 5 Diff的效率良好(93%),是一款合适的血液学细胞分析仪。

相似文献

1
A short evaluation of a new haematological analyser: the Cobas Argos 5 Diff.新型血液分析仪Cobas Argos 5 Diff的简要评估
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1993 Sep;31(9):603-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1993.31.9.603.
2
Evaluation of the leukocyte differential flags on an hematologic analyzer. The Cobas Argos 5 Diff.血液分析仪上白细胞分类标记的评估。科巴斯阿戈斯5分类仪。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Nov;104(5):495-502. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/104.5.495.
3
Evaluation of the Roche Cobas Argos 5Diff automated haematology analyser with comparison to a Coulter STKS.罗氏Cobas Argos 5Diff全自动血液分析仪与库尔特STKS的对比评估。
Clin Lab Haematol. 1994 Jun;16(2):117-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1994.tb00398.x.
4
Clinical performance of leukocyte differential on the new Roche Cobas Vega haematological analyzer.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997 Feb;35(2):105-10.
5
Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.贝克曼库尔特AcT 5 diff AL血液分析仪在医院环境中的评估
Lab Hematol. 2003;9(3):167-74.
6
Peripheral blood monocyte counting: towards a new reference method.外周血单核细胞计数:迈向一种新的参考方法。
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1995 Nov;33(11):839-45. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1995.33.11.839.
7
Comparison of white blood cell differential percentages determined by the in-house LaserCyte hematology analyzer and a manual method.内部激光血细胞分析仪与手工方法测定的白细胞分类百分比的比较。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2006 Sep;35(3):295-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2006.tb00134.x.
8
An evaluation of the CELL-DYN 1700 haematology analyser: automated cell counting and three-part leucocyte differentiation.
Clin Lab Haematol. 1996 Sep;18(3):171-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2257.1996.00174.x.
9
Evaluation of the ABX Cobas Vega automated hematology analyzer and comparison with the Coulter STKS.ABX Cobas Vega全自动血液分析仪的评估及与库尔特STKS的比较。
Hematol Cell Ther. 1997 Jun;39(3):149-58. doi: 10.1007/s00282-997-0149-6.
10
Complete analytical and diagnostic performances of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3500.雅培Cell Dyn 3500的完整分析和诊断性能。
Panminerva Med. 1998 Jun;40(2):116-25.