da Silva F C
Department of Urology, Hospital do Desterro, Lisbon, Portugal.
Eur Urol. 1993;24 Suppl 2:113-7. doi: 10.1159/000474401.
Subjective quality-of-life assessments obtained from investigators and patients were compared in a subset of 76 patients from an EORTC study (protocol 30853) on metastatic prostatic carcinoma. In this study the therapeutic effect of orchiectomy was compared with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue depot preparation and flutamide in 327 patients in total. Pretreatment, 6- and 12-month quality-of-life assessments revealed large variations between the patients' and the investigators' evaluation of performance status and sexual status (potency). Correlation analysis showed that reduced social life, impaired sexual potency and fatigue played important roles in overall psychological well-being. It was concluded that quality-of-life assessments obtained by self-administration questionnaires is a feasible approach and provides a tool to evaluate the benefits of treatment in prostate cancer.
在一项欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)关于转移性前列腺癌的研究(方案30853)的76例患者亚组中,比较了研究者和患者的主观生活质量评估结果。在该研究中,总共327例患者接受了睾丸切除术、促黄体生成素释放激素类似物长效制剂和氟他胺的治疗效果比较。治疗前、治疗6个月和12个月时的生活质量评估显示,患者与研究者对体能状态和性功能状态(性能力)的评价存在很大差异。相关分析表明,社交生活减少、性能力受损和疲劳在总体心理健康中起重要作用。得出的结论是,通过自我管理问卷获得的生活质量评估是一种可行的方法,并且为评估前列腺癌治疗的益处提供了一种工具。