• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EMIT II与在线RIA用于药物筛查的方法比较。

Method comparison of EMIT II and online with RIA for drug screening.

作者信息

Armbruster D A, Schwarzhoff R H, Pierce B L, Hubster E C

机构信息

Air Force Drug Testing Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 1993 Nov;38(6):1326-41.

PMID:8263477
Abstract

The newest formulation of the EMIT assay for drugs of abuse, EMIT II, and a new immunoassay, OnLine, using the kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution methodology, were evaluated for marijuana, cocaine, opiates, barbiturates, and phencyclidine. Both types of immunoassays were performed on an Hitachi 717 analyzer. Calibration curves, the degree of separation between negative and cutoff calibrators, precision, probability of carryover from positive to negative samples, and overall ease and speed of analysis were evaluated. EMIT II and OnLine were compared with RIA tests for the five drugs to determine each assay's ability to detect samples which confirm positive by GC/MS. The RIA and OnLine marijuana tests detected > 99% of confirmed positive samples while EMIT II detected about 90%. All three immunoassays performed equivalently for cocaine and opiates, each assay detecting at least 98% of positives. Barbiturates showed the greatest disparity with OnLine detecting 96%, EMIT II 85%, and RIA 79% of confirmed positive samples. Too few phencyclidine positive samples were detected for a method comparison study. The fully automated EMIT II and OnLine assays are preferable for a variety of reasons to our laboratory's current semi-automated RIA tests for large volume urine testing. The immunoassays offer comparable performance for some drugs but not for others.

摘要

对用于检测滥用药物的新型EMIT检测法(EMIT II)以及一种采用溶液中微粒动力学相互作用方法的新型免疫检测法OnLine,进行了大麻、可卡因、鸦片制剂、巴比妥酸盐和苯环己哌啶检测方面的评估。两种免疫检测法均在日立717分析仪上进行。评估了校准曲线、阴性和临界校准品之间的分离程度、精密度、从阳性样品到阴性样品的残留概率以及分析的总体简便性和速度。将EMIT II和OnLine与针对这五种药物的放射免疫分析(RIA)测试进行比较,以确定每种检测法检测经气相色谱/质谱联用仪(GC/MS)确认为阳性的样品的能力。RIA和OnLine大麻检测法检测出超过99%的经确认的阳性样品,而EMIT II检测出约90%。对于可卡因和鸦片制剂,所有三种免疫检测法的表现相当,每种检测法至少检测出98%的阳性样品。巴比妥酸盐检测结果差异最大,OnLine检测出96%的经确认的阳性样品,EMIT II为85%,RIA为79%。由于苯环己哌啶阳性样品检测数量过少,无法进行方法比较研究。出于多种原因,全自动的EMIT II和OnLine检测法比我们实验室目前用于大批量尿液检测的半自动RIA测试更可取。这些免疫检测法对某些药物的检测性能相当,但对其他药物则不然。

相似文献

1
Method comparison of EMIT II and online with RIA for drug screening.EMIT II与在线RIA用于药物筛查的方法比较。
J Forensic Sci. 1993 Nov;38(6):1326-41.
2
Enzyme immunoassay, kinetic microparticle immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, and fluorescence polarization immunoassay compared for drugs-of-abuse screening.对酶免疫测定、动态微粒免疫测定、放射免疫测定和荧光偏振免疫测定进行比较以用于药物滥用筛查。
Clin Chem. 1993 Oct;39(10):2137-46.
3
Method comparison of EMIT 700 and EMIT II with RIA for drug screening.用于药物筛查的EMIT 700和EMIT II与放射免疫分析(RIA)的方法比较。
J Anal Toxicol. 1994 Mar-Apr;18(2):110-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/18.2.110.
4
Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Mar 10;157(2-3):106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.022.
5
Precision and comparability of Abuscreen OnLine assays for drugs of abuse screening in urine on Hitachi 917 with other immunochemical tests and with GC/MS.在日立917上使用Abuscreen OnLine分析法对尿液中滥用药物进行筛查时,其与其他免疫化学检测方法以及气相色谱/质谱联用仪(GC/MS)相比的精密度和可比性。
Clin Lab. 2000;46(1-2):49-52.
6
Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) for drugs-of-abuse screening.
Clin Chem. 1995 Jan;41(1):92-8.
7
CEDIA for screening drugs of abuse in urine and the effect of adulterants.
J Forensic Sci. 1995 Jul;40(4):614-8.
8
[Comparison of the MTP immunoassay with EMIT in blood screening for drugs].
Arch Kriminol. 1998 Nov-Dec;202(5-6):165-72.
9
A comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUP, abuscreen ONTRAK, abuscreen ONLINE, and GC/MS urinalysis test results.ONTRAK TESTCUP、abuscreen ONTRAK、abuscreen ONLINE与气相色谱/质谱联用尿液分析测试结果的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 1998 Jan;43(1):35-40.
10
Evaluation of the Abuscreen ONLINE assay for amphetamines on the Hitachi 737: comparison with EMIT and GC/MS methods.在日立737上对用于检测苯丙胺类药物的Abuscreen ONLINE检测法的评估:与EMIT和气相色谱/质谱联用方法的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 1995 Jan;40(1):108-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Distribution and predominance of genotype 3 in hepatitis C virus carriers in the province of kahramanmaras, Turkey.土耳其加济安泰普省丙型肝炎病毒携带者中3型基因型的分布及优势情况
Hepat Mon. 2015 Apr 25;15(4):e25142. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.15(4)2015.25142. eCollection 2015 Apr.
2
Evaluation of two enzyme immunoassays for the detection of the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine in 1,398 urine specimens.评估两种酶免疫分析法检测 1398 份尿样中可卡因代谢产物苯甲酰爱康宁。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2012 May;26(3):130-5. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21498.