Nakata T
Ibaraki Plant, Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
J Parenter Sci Technol. 1993 Sep-Oct;47(5):258-64.
The kinetics of destruction by dry heat of two typical endotoxins, Escherichia coli 055:B5 (E. coli endotoxin) and Salmonella abortus equi (S. abortus equi endotoxin), were determined using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) and pyrogen assays. The efficiency of recovery of these endotoxins from carriers using a pyrogen assay was also determined simultaneously. In the LAL assay 0.1-10,000 EU was used and 10-1000 EU in the pyrogen assay. Recoveries of E. coli endotoxin and S. abortus equi endotoxin were, respectively, 49.7-92.0% and 27.0-70.1% by the LAL assay, and 31.1% and 60.6% by the pyrogen assay. Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR) spectra demonstrated the presence of chemical structural differences between the two endotoxins. By dry heat (200 or 250 degrees C), there were no significant differences in the destruction kinetics between the two endotoxins; either endotoxin can therefore be adapted for use in the endotoxin challenge test. Destruction in the pyrogen assay was significantly quicker than that predicted by the LAL assay for each of the two endotoxins. In this endotoxin destruction system, 3 log cycle reduction (the United State Pharmacopeia (USP) recommendation for the depyrogenation process) could not be obtained by challenge with 10,000 EU of endotoxin under the depyrogenation conditions of 200 degrees C for 60 min (a set of conditions described in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP)), though little pyrogenicity remained. On the other hand, at 250 degrees C for 30 min (a set of conditions described in the EP, USP and Pharmacopoeia of Japan (JP)),a 3 log cycle reduction was achieved without any pyrogenicity remaining.
使用鲎试剂(LAL)和热原检测法测定了两种典型内毒素——大肠杆菌055:B5(大肠杆菌内毒素)和马流产沙门氏菌(马流产沙门氏菌内毒素)干热破坏的动力学。同时还测定了使用热原检测法从载体中回收这些内毒素的效率。在LAL检测中使用了0.1 - 10,000 EU,在热原检测中使用了10 - 1000 EU。通过LAL检测,大肠杆菌内毒素和马流产沙门氏菌内毒素的回收率分别为49.7% - 92.0%和27.0% - 70.1%,通过热原检测法的回收率分别为31.1%和60.6%。傅里叶变换红外(FT - IR)光谱显示这两种内毒素之间存在化学结构差异。通过干热(200或250℃)处理,两种内毒素的破坏动力学没有显著差异;因此,任何一种内毒素都可用于内毒素挑战试验。对于这两种内毒素中的每一种,热原检测中的破坏都明显快于LAL检测所预测的速度。在这个内毒素破坏系统中,在200℃ 60分钟的去热原条件下(欧洲药典(EP)中描述的一组条件)用10,000 EU的内毒素进行挑战,虽然几乎没有热原性残留,但无法实现3个对数周期的降低(美国药典(USP)对去热原过程的建议)。另一方面,在250℃ 30分钟(EP、USP和日本药典(JP)中描述的一组条件)下,实现了3个对数周期的降低且没有任何热原性残留。