Suppr超能文献

30款动脉血压自测设备的准确性和可重复性

Accuracy and reproducibility of 30 devices for self-measurement of arterial blood pressure.

作者信息

van Egmond J, Lenders J W, Weernink E, Thien T

机构信息

Institute for Anesthesiology, St. Radboud Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1993 Oct;6(10):873-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.10.873.

Abstract

Thirty commercially available noninvasive devices for self-measurement of blood pressure were tested for accuracy and reproducibility against intraarterial measurement in 15 normotensive and 15 hypertensive subjects. For reference to outpatient measurements, a standard sphygmomanometer was included. Analysis of the data for any device was performed according to a statistical model in which two types of errors, representing accuracy and reproducibility, were distinguished: offset (mean difference between intraarterial measurement and device) and standard deviation (comprising intraindividual and interindividual variability). Linearity of the devices was analyzed by linear regression with intraarterial measurement as independent variable. The average offset of all tested devices amounted to 11.7 mm Hg (ranging from -0.2 to 21.4 between instruments) for systolic blood pressure and -1.6 mm Hg (range -11.4 to 8.1) for diastolic blood pressure. The standard deviation between instruments ranged from 7.0 to 15.4 mm Hg for systolic and from 3.3 to 16.0 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. Except for the devices based on the oscillometric principle, most (semi-) automated devices demonstrated a variability similar to the mercury sphygmomanometer (offset = 14.3 for systolic and 0.1 mm Hg for diastolic pressure; standard deviation = 7.5 for systolic and 5.6 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure). Devices based on the oscillometric principle had a significantly larger variability. It is concluded that new devices should be tested for accuracy and reproducibility before application for clinical use. Blood pressure measurements from instruments with larger offset are only comparable to values from other instruments after rescaling in accordance with their offset.

摘要

对30种市售的用于自我测量血压的无创设备进行了测试,以评估其相对于15名血压正常和15名高血压受试者的动脉内测量的准确性和可重复性。为了与门诊测量进行对比,纳入了一台标准血压计。根据一个统计模型对任何设备的数据进行分析,该模型区分了代表准确性和可重复性的两种误差类型:偏移(动脉内测量与设备之间的平均差异)和标准差(包括个体内和个体间的变异性)。以动脉内测量作为自变量,通过线性回归分析设备的线性。所有测试设备的收缩压平均偏移为11.7毫米汞柱(仪器之间的范围为-0.2至21.4),舒张压平均偏移为-1.6毫米汞柱(范围为-11.4至8.1)。仪器之间的收缩压标准差范围为7.0至15.4毫米汞柱,舒张压标准差范围为3.3至16.0毫米汞柱。除了基于示波原理的设备外,大多数(半)自动设备显示出与汞血压计相似的变异性(收缩压偏移=14.3,舒张压偏移=0.1毫米汞柱;收缩压标准差=7.5,舒张压标准差=5.6毫米汞柱)。基于示波原理的设备变异性明显更大。得出的结论是,新设备在临床应用前应进行准确性和可重复性测试。偏移较大的仪器所测血压值只有在根据其偏移重新校准后才能与其他仪器的值进行比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验