Volta U, Molinaro N, De Franceschi L, Fratangelo D, Bianchi F B
Medicina Interna 2, Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Terapia Medica, Università di Bologna, Italy.
Ital J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;27(2):64-8.
In order to establish whether antigliadin antibodies, detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IFL-AGA), display the same antibody reactivity as ELISA-AGA or whether they cross-react with reticulin antibodies (R1-ARA and antiendomysial--EmA), sera from 16 untreated coeliac patients were repeatedly absorbed with crude gliadin dissolved in ethanol/water solution. The comparison between antibody activities before and after absorption demonstrated that IFL-AGA and ELISA-AGA are nothing but a single antibody, as both of them completely disappeared or markedly reduced their titre after incubation with crude gliadin. Moreover, AGA reactivity differs from the reactivity of antibodies directed against reticulin, as R1-ARA and EmA titres were not affected by crude gliadin absorption. The absolute absence of cross-reactivity between IFL-AGA and R1-ARA is further confirmed by the removal of the former and persistence of the latter after gliadin absorption in the 9 sera positive for both antibodies. Sera of coeliac patients, therefore, show only two discrete antibody reactivities, one directed to gliadin and the other to reticulin components.
为了确定通过间接免疫荧光法(IFL - AGA)检测到的抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体是否与酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA - AGA)显示相同的抗体反应性,或者它们是否与网硬蛋白抗体(R1 - ARA和抗肌内膜抗体 - EmA)发生交叉反应,对16例未经治疗的乳糜泻患者的血清用溶解于乙醇/水溶液中的粗制麦醇溶蛋白反复进行吸收处理。吸收前后抗体活性的比较表明,IFL - AGA和ELISA - AGA实际上是同一种抗体,因为它们在与粗制麦醇溶蛋白孵育后均完全消失或显著降低了滴度。此外,抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体反应性与针对网硬蛋白的抗体反应性不同,因为R1 - ARA和EmA滴度不受粗制麦醇溶蛋白吸收的影响。在9例两种抗体均呈阳性的血清中,麦醇溶蛋白吸收后前者消失而后者依然存在,这进一步证实了IFL - AGA与R1 - ARA之间绝对不存在交叉反应。因此,乳糜泻患者的血清仅显示两种不同的抗体反应性,一种针对麦醇溶蛋白,另一种针对网硬蛋白成分。