Adriaanse Marlou, Leffler Daniel A
Dig Dis. 2015;33(2):236-243. doi: 10.1159/000371405. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
The advent of highly reliable noninvasive celiac diagnostic tests has transformed the field of celiac disease, from diagnosis, to evaluation of epidemiology, to clinical and translational research. Serologic tests in their modern forms are highly sensitive and specific for diagnosis, allowing for consideration of avoidance of diagnostic intestinal biopsy in some settings. On the other hand, as predictors of intestinal damage and for use in monitoring disease activity, currently available noninvasive tests have been disappointing. Serologic tests, while a measure of disease activity, do not correlate well with histology or symptomatology, and it is unclear if they predict long-term risk. Additionally, while the many clinically available tests have improved accessibility, they can have widely different cutoff levels and overall performance, making the comparison of levels in individual patients over time and across populations quite difficult. In the future, we can expect to see improvement in the currently available serologic tests including tissue transglutaminase and deamidated gliadin peptide with expansion of the dynamic range of the tests, and the celiac care community should push for a standardization of assays that would simplify research and patient care. Additionally, current serologic tests are measures of the adaptive immune response in celiac disease but do not directly measure intestinal inflammation. Promising work on intestinal fatty acid-binding protein and other assays which directly measure intestinal damage may complement traditional serologic tests and further improve our ability to noninvasively diagnose and monitor celiac disease. The coming years hold promise for the continuing evolution of serum-based tests in celiac disease with the possibility of substantial improvement of patient care and clinical research.
高度可靠的非侵入性乳糜泻诊断测试的出现改变了乳糜泻领域,从诊断到流行病学评估,再到临床和转化研究。现代形式的血清学测试对诊断具有高度敏感性和特异性,在某些情况下可以考虑避免进行诊断性肠道活检。另一方面,作为肠道损伤的预测指标以及用于监测疾病活动,目前可用的非侵入性测试令人失望。血清学测试虽然是疾病活动的一种度量,但与组织学或症状学的相关性不佳,并且它们是否能预测长期风险尚不清楚。此外,虽然许多临床可用的测试提高了可及性,但它们的临界值水平和整体性能可能有很大差异,使得比较个体患者随时间和跨人群的水平非常困难。未来,我们有望看到目前可用的血清学测试有所改进,包括组织转谷氨酰胺酶和去酰胺化麦醇溶蛋白肽测试,扩大测试的动态范围,乳糜泻护理界应推动检测方法的标准化,这将简化研究和患者护理。此外,目前的血清学测试是乳糜泻适应性免疫反应的度量,但不能直接测量肠道炎症。关于肠道脂肪酸结合蛋白和其他直接测量肠道损伤的检测方法的有前景的研究可能会补充传统的血清学测试,并进一步提高我们非侵入性诊断和监测乳糜泻的能力。未来几年,基于血清的测试在乳糜泻方面有望持续发展,有可能大幅改善患者护理和临床研究。