Herring K M, Richie D H
Department of Surgery, Valley Hospital and Medical Center, Spokane, WA 99206.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993 Sep;83(9):515-22. doi: 10.7547/87507315-83-9-515.
A longitudinal single-blind study was conducted to test the friction blister prevention properties of synthetic acrylic socks in a generic construction. This study serves as a comparison with the authors' previous work comparing acrylic and cotton socks in a patented padded construction. Twenty-seven long-distance runners provided data regarding dampness, temperature, friction blister incidence, severity, and size. Two different socks were tested; each was identical in every aspect of construction except the fiber content. One test sock was composed of 100% synthetic acrylic fibers, and the other was composed of 100% natural cotton fibers. These results were unsuccessful at demonstrating any superiority of cotton or acrylic fibers when knitting produced a generic "cushion sole" sock. The superiority of acrylic fibers has thus far been demonstrated only when sock knitting provides adequate anatomical padding [corrected].
进行了一项纵向单盲研究，以测试普通结构的合成丙烯酸袜子预防摩擦水泡的性能。本研究是与作者之前在专利加垫结构中比较丙烯酸袜子和棉袜的工作进行对比。27名长跑运动员提供了有关潮湿、温度、摩擦水泡发生率、严重程度和大小的数据。测试了两种不同的袜子；除纤维含量外，它们在结构的各个方面都相同。一种测试袜子由100%的合成丙烯酸纤维组成，另一种由100%的天然棉纤维组成。当针织生产出普通的“缓冲鞋底”袜子时，这些结果未能证明棉纤维或丙烯酸纤维有任何优越性。到目前为止，只有当袜子针织提供足够的解剖学衬垫时，丙烯酸纤维的优越性才得到证明[已修正]。
