Chihara E, Nishida A, Kodo M, Yoshimura N, Matsumura M, Yamamoto M, Tsukada T
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
Ophthalmic Surg. 1993 Nov;24(11):735-9.
Seventy-nine adult patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were randomly assigned to treatment by modified trabeculotomy ab externo (TAB) (n = 44) and by trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C (TMC) (n = 35), and the postoperative outcomes achieved with these two techniques were compared. With TAB, the probability of successful intraocular pressure control 1 year postoperatively was .8644; with TMC, .8432; the difference is not significant (P = .7956). However, postoperative complications such as corneal epithelial damage, bleb leaks, hypotony, flat anterior chamber, and serous choroidal detachment were significantly less frequent in the TAB group. Largely because of this latter consideration, in selected cases, TAB may be a viable alternative to TMC.
79例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)成年患者被随机分为改良外路小梁切开术(TAB)治疗组(n = 44)和丝裂霉素C辅助小梁切除术(TMC)治疗组(n = 35),并比较了这两种技术的术后效果。采用TAB时,术后1年眼压控制成功的概率为0.8644;采用TMC时,为0.8432;差异无统计学意义(P = 0.7956)。然而,TAB组角膜上皮损伤、滤过泡渗漏、低眼压、无前房和浆液性脉络膜脱离等术后并发症的发生率明显较低。主要出于后一种考虑,在某些特定情况下,TAB可能是TMC的可行替代方法。