Cornum R L, Caldwell J L, Ludwick R
U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Biomedical Applications Research Division, Fort Rucker, AL 36362-5292.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 Dec;64(12):1120-4.
A greater percentage of qualified student pilots fail the AH-64 (Apache) transition than any other advanced aircraft transition in the Army. We studied 140 consecutive students presenting for training in an effort to identify factors which might predict success or failure in the AH-64 course. Questionnaires were used to elicit demographic, anxiety level, and motion sickness history information prior to beginning Apache flight training. Motion sickness symptoms (MSS) during the enclosed cockpit, or "bag," phase of training were quantified using pre- and postbag flight symptom questionnaires. Performance measures included grades and flight hours required to pass the course. Only one piece of information obtained prior to flight training was related to performance in the AH-64 course; i.e., students who requested the transition performed measurably better than students who did not. While 7% of pilots described significant MSS on the first day of enclosed cockpit flight, this decreased to 2% by day 5. Severity of symptoms during bag phase was not related to any measure of subsequent performance.
在陆军中,与其他任何高级飞机过渡培训相比,有更大比例具备资质的学生飞行员在AH - 64(阿帕奇)过渡培训中失败。我们研究了140名连续前来参加培训的学生,试图找出可能预测AH - 64课程成败的因素。在开始阿帕奇飞行训练前,通过问卷收集人口统计学、焦虑水平和晕动病史信息。在封闭驾驶舱(即“座舱”)阶段的训练中,使用座舱飞行前后症状问卷对晕动症状(MSS)进行量化。绩效指标包括课程成绩和通过该课程所需的飞行小时数。飞行训练前获取的信息中,只有一项与AH - 64课程的表现有关;即,主动申请过渡培训的学生表现明显优于未申请者。虽然7%的飞行员在封闭座舱飞行第一天描述有明显的晕动症状,但到第5天时这一比例降至2%。座舱阶段症状的严重程度与后续任何绩效指标均无关联。