van Delden J J, van der Maas P J, Pijnenborg L, Looman C W
Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Med Ethics. 1993 Dec;19(4):200-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.4.200.
The use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in Dutch hospitals was studied as part of a nationwide study on medical decisions concerning the end of life. DNR decisions are made in 6 per cent of all admissions, and 61 per cent of all in-hospital deaths were preceded by a DNR decision. We found that in only 14 per cent of the cases had the patients been involved in the DNR decision (32 per cent of competent patients). The concept of futility is analysed as these findings are discussed. We conclude that determining the effectiveness of resuscitation is a medical judgement whereas determining the proportionality (burden/benefit ratio) of it requires a discussion between doctor and patient (or his or her surrogates). Since the respondents in the cases without patient involvement gave many reasons for their decision that went beyond determining effectiveness, we conclude that more patient involvement would have been desirable.
作为一项关于临终医疗决策的全国性研究的一部分,我们对荷兰医院中“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的使用情况进行了研究。在所有入院病例中,有6%做出了DNR决策,而在所有院内死亡病例中,有61%在死亡前做出了DNR决策。我们发现,只有14%的病例中患者参与了DNR决策(有行为能力患者的参与率为32%)。在讨论这些发现时,我们分析了“无意义”这一概念。我们得出结论,确定复苏的有效性是一项医学判断,而确定其相称性(负担/受益比)则需要医生与患者(或其代理人)之间进行讨论。由于在患者未参与的病例中,受访者给出了许多超出确定有效性之外的决策理由,因此我们得出结论,患者更多地参与会更好。