Freedman R R, Keegan D, Rodriguez J, Galloway M P
Department of Psychiatry, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit.
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1993 Jun;18(2):107-14. doi: 10.1007/BF01848111.
Thirty-nine normal volunteers of both sexes were randomly assigned to receive 8 sessions of temperature biofeedback or autogenic training to increase finger temperature. Temperature biofeedback subjects produced significant elevations in finger temperature during training, whereas those who received autogenic training did not. Temperature feedback subjects had significantly higher heart rates and diastolic blood pressures during training compared to autogenic subjects. There were no significant changes or group differences in plasma catecholamine levels. These data do not support the hypothesis that feedback-induced vasodilation is accompanied by decreased sympathetic activation in normal populations, when only temperature biofeedback is employed.
39名男女正常志愿者被随机分配接受8次温度生物反馈或自生训练,以提高手指温度。温度生物反馈组的受试者在训练期间手指温度显著升高,而接受自生训练的受试者则没有。与自生训练组的受试者相比,温度反馈组的受试者在训练期间心率和舒张压显著更高。血浆儿茶酚胺水平没有显著变化或组间差异。这些数据不支持以下假设:当仅采用温度生物反馈时,反馈诱导的血管舒张伴随着正常人群交感神经激活的降低。