Timsit J F, Misset B, Francoual S, Goldstein F W, Vaury P, Carlet J
Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Chest. 1993 Jul;104(1):104-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.1.104.
Protected specimen brush (PSB) is considered to be one of the standard methods for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, but to our knowledge, intraindividual variability in results has not been reported previously.
To compare the results of two PSB performed in the same subsegment on patients with suspected ICU-acquired pneumonia (IAP).
Between October 1991 and April 1992, each mechanically ventilated patient with suspected IAP underwent bronchoscopy with two successive PSB in the lung segment identified as abnormal on radiographs. Results of the two PSB cultures were compared using 10(3) cfu/ml cutoff for a positive result. Four definite diagnoses were established during the follow up: definite pneumonia, probable pneumonia, excluded pneumonia, and uncertain pneumonia.
Forty-two episodes in 26 patients were studied; 60 percent of patients received prior antibiotic therapy. Thirty-two microorganisms were isolated from 24 pairs of PSB. Definite diagnosis was definite pneumonia in 7, probable pneumonia in 8, excluded pneumonia in 17, and uncertain pneumonia in 10 cases.
The PSB recovered the same microorganisms and argued for a good qualitative reproducibility. The distinction of positive and negative results on the basis of the 10(3) cfu/ml classic threshold was less reproducible. For 24 percent of the microorganisms recovered and in 16.7 percent of episodes of suspected IAP, the two consecutive samples gave results spread out on each side of the 10(3) cfu/ml cutoff. Discordance was higher when definite diagnosis was certain or probable than when diagnosis was excluded (p = 0.015). There was no statistical effect of the order of samples between the two specimens for bacterial index and microorganism concentrations.
These findings argue for the poor repeatability of PSB in suspected IAP and question the yield of the 10(3) cfu/ml threshold. In attempting to diagnose IAP, the results of PSB must be interpreted with caution considering the intraindividual variability.
保护性标本刷检(PSB)被认为是诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎的标准方法之一,但据我们所知,此前尚未报道过个体内结果的变异性。
比较在怀疑患有重症监护病房获得性肺炎(IAP)的患者同一肺段进行的两次PSB的结果。
在1991年10月至1992年4月期间,每例怀疑患有IAP的机械通气患者均接受支气管镜检查,在胸部X线片显示异常的肺段连续进行两次PSB。以10³cfu/ml作为阳性结果的临界值,比较两次PSB培养的结果。在随访期间确定了4种明确诊断:确诊肺炎、可能肺炎、排除肺炎和不确定肺炎。
对26例患者的42次发病情况进行了研究;60%的患者接受过抗生素治疗。从24对PSB中分离出32种微生物。确诊为确诊肺炎7例,可能肺炎8例,排除肺炎17例,不确定肺炎10例。
PSB检出了相同的微生物,表明具有良好的定性重复性。基于10³cfu/ml经典临界值区分阳性和阴性结果的重复性较差。对于24%的检出微生物以及16.7%的疑似IAP发病情况,连续两次样本的结果分布在10³cfu/ml临界值的两侧。当确诊为确诊或可能肺炎时,不一致性高于排除诊断时(p = 0.015)。两次样本的采集顺序对细菌指数和微生物浓度无统计学影响。
这些发现表明PSB在疑似IAP中的重复性较差,并对10³cfu/ml临界值的有效性提出质疑。在试图诊断IAP时,考虑到个体内变异性,必须谨慎解释PSB的结果。