Obeid A N
Biomedical Instrumentation Centre, School of Engineering, Oxford Polytechnic, Headington, UK.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1993 Jan;31(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02446892.
The paper reports the results of investigations comparing the relative in vitro responses of different signal processing algorithms commonly employed in laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). A versatile laser Doppler system is described which enabled complex signal processing to be implemented relatively simply using digital analysis. The flexibility of the system allowed a variety of processing algorithms to be studied by simply characterising the algorithm of interest under software control using a personal computer. An in vitro physical model is also presented which was used to maintain reproducible fluid flows. Flows of particles were studied in a physical model using both a near-infra-red (NIR) diode and an He/Ne laser source. The results show that frequency-weighted algorithms are responsive to both particle velocity and concentration, whereas non-weighted algorithms respond to concentration only. The linearity of the velocity response is critically dependent on both the dimensions of the in vitro model and the frequency bandwidth of the signal-processing algorithm.
本文报道了对激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)中常用的不同信号处理算法的相对体外响应进行比较的研究结果。描述了一种通用的激光多普勒系统,该系统能够使用数字分析相对简单地实现复杂的信号处理。该系统的灵活性允许通过使用个人计算机在软件控制下简单地表征感兴趣的算法来研究各种处理算法。还提出了一种体外物理模型,用于维持可重复的流体流动。使用近红外(NIR)二极管和氦氖激光源在物理模型中研究了颗粒流。结果表明,频率加权算法对颗粒速度和浓度都有响应,而非加权算法仅对浓度有响应。速度响应的线性程度严重依赖于体外模型的尺寸和信号处理算法的频率带宽。