Polster M R, Gray P A, O'Sullivan G, McCarthy R A, Park G R
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
Br J Anaesth. 1993 Jun;70(6):612-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/70.6.612.
We have compared the sedative and amnesic effects of midazolam and propofol in 35 volunteers. Sedation was measured by simple reaction time immediately before and after a bolus injection and 1 h after the commencement of a subsequent continuous infusion. Memory was measured three times using two memory tests: perceptual facilitation provided an implicit memory measure and recognition provided an explicit memory measure. Propofol and midazolam had similar sedative effects both immediately after bolus doses and after 1-h continuous infusions of the drugs. In contrast, midazolam had a more profound amnesic effect than propofol on the recognition memory test. The drugs had little effect on performance with the implicit memory test. Performance on the memory tests was unrelated to sedation.
我们比较了咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对35名志愿者的镇静和遗忘作用。通过单次推注前后以及随后持续输注开始1小时后的简单反应时间来测量镇静效果。使用两项记忆测试对记忆进行了三次测量:知觉促进提供了一项内隐记忆测量,识别提供了一项外显记忆测量。推注剂量后即刻以及药物持续输注1小时后,丙泊酚和咪达唑仑具有相似的镇静效果。相比之下,在识别记忆测试中,咪达唑仑比丙泊酚具有更显著的遗忘作用。这些药物对内隐记忆测试的表现影响很小。记忆测试的表现与镇静无关。