Bekker H, Modell M, Denniss G, Silver A, Mathew C, Bobrow M, Marteau T
Wellcome Psychology and Genetics Research Group, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, London.
BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1584-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6892.1584.
To determine the acceptability and feasibility of screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis in a primary care setting.
Follow up study over 15 months of patients offered carrier testing by mouthwash.
A general practice in inner London.
5529 patients aged 18-45 invited by various methods and combinations of methods (letter, booklet, personal approach) for testing.
Uptake of screening, anxiety, and knowledge of test.
957 (17%) invitees were screened over the 15 months. 28 carriers and no carrier couples were detected. Uptake rates were 12% (59/502 patients) among patients invited by letter and tested by appointment; 9% (47/496) among patients invited by letter, with leaflet, and tested by appointment; 4% (128/2953) among patients invited by letter six weeks before the end of the study and tested by appointment; 17% (81/471) among patients offered passive opportunistic testing; 70% (453/649) among patients offered active opportunistic testing; and 25% (22/88) among patients offered active opportunistic testing by appointment. A short term rise in anxiety among those given a positive test result had dissipated by three months. At three months about one fifth and one third of those given positive and negative results respectively did not understand their results correctly.
These results suggest that the strongest variable in determining uptake of screening is the active approach by a health professional offering immediate testing. It remains to be resolved whether the high uptake rates achieved by active recruitment indicate a supply push for this new test rather than a demand from the population.
确定在基层医疗环境中筛查囊性纤维化携带者的可接受性和可行性。
对通过漱口水进行携带者检测的患者进行为期15个月的随访研究。
伦敦市中心的一家普通诊所。
通过多种方法及方法组合(信件、手册、个人接触)邀请5529名年龄在18至45岁之间的患者进行检测。
筛查的接受情况、焦虑程度以及对检测的了解程度。
在15个月内,957名(17%)受邀者接受了筛查。检测出28名携带者,未发现携带者夫妇。通过信件邀请并预约检测的患者中,接受率为12%(59/502例患者);通过信件并附带传单邀请且预约检测的患者中,接受率为9%(47/496例);在研究结束前六周通过信件邀请并预约检测的患者中,接受率为4%(128/2953例);接受被动机会性检测的患者中,接受率为17%(81/471例);接受主动机会性检测的患者中,接受率为70%(453/649例);通过预约接受主动机会性检测的患者中,接受率为25%(22/88例)。检测结果呈阳性者的焦虑在短期内有所上升,但三个月后已消退。三个月时,检测结果呈阳性和阴性的患者中,分别约有五分之一和三分之一没有正确理解检测结果。
这些结果表明,决定筛查接受率的最主要变量是健康专业人员采用主动方式提供即时检测。主动招募所实现的高接受率是表明对这项新检测的供应推动而非人群需求,这一问题仍有待解决。