Peterson L, Ewigman B, Kivlahan C
Psychology Department, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):934-50.
Parents, social service workers, and medical personnel failed to differ in the amount of time they estimated that children of 11 differing ages should be left without adult supervision within 5 different supervision domains. More hazardous circumstances dramatically reduced the amount of time respondents said children should be left unsupervised. Amount of unsupervised time increased with age, with clear developmental cutoffs that varied by level and type of risk. When the moderate center of the distribution was examined, 3 clear areas of consensus emerged. For most domains, constant supervision was recommended for preschool children. For early elementary school children, nearly constant (0-5 min without supervision) or close (0-15 min without supervision) supervision was recommended in safer locations, with constant supervision still recommended in high-risk situations. Only with older children was there an absence of consensus regarding supervision. The implications of these results for future injury prevention research are discussed.
父母、社会服务工作者和医务人员在估计11个不同年龄段的儿童在5个不同监管领域中应无人监管的时间长度方面没有差异。更危险的情况显著减少了受访者表示儿童应无人监管的时间。无人监管时间随着年龄增长而增加,不同风险水平和类型有明显的发育界限。当检查分布的适度中心时,出现了3个明显的共识领域。对于大多数领域,建议对学龄前儿童进行持续监管。对于小学低年级儿童,在较安全的地点建议几乎持续(无人监管0 - 5分钟)或密切(无人监管0 - 15分钟)监管,在高风险情况下仍建议持续监管。只有对于年龄较大的儿童,在监管方面才没有达成共识。讨论了这些结果对未来伤害预防研究的影响。