• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

百日咳疫苗在流行期和非流行期的年龄特异性效力。

Age-specific efficacy of pertussis vaccine during epidemic and non-epidemic periods.

作者信息

Ramsay M E, Farrington C P, Miller E

机构信息

Immunisation Division, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 1993 Aug;111(1):41-8. doi: 10.1017/s095026880005665x.

DOI:10.1017/s095026880005665x
PMID:8348931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2271201/
Abstract

A national survey was conducted of 3150 notified cases of whooping cough in order to determine age-specific pertussis vaccine efficacy by the 'screening' method. The cases were collected over two periods, one just prior to the start and one at the first peak of the whooping cough epidemic of 1989-90. Vaccination status was determined by a postal questionnaire to the reporting doctor and clinical data were also collected to provide efficacy estimates according to standardized case definitions. Overall, observed vaccine efficacy was high but differed between epidemic (87%) and non-epidemic (93%) periods (P = 0.03). Efficacy estimates were generally higher for typical or severe cases than for children with an atypical illness. Vaccine efficacy declined with age (P < 0.01) but estimates remained high up to the age of 8 years. This study will provide baseline data for comparison with efficacy observed from similar studies of children immunized at an accelerated schedule and from phase III studies of acellular pertussis vaccines performed elsewhere.

摘要

为了通过“筛查”方法确定特定年龄的百日咳疫苗效力,对3150例报告的百日咳病例进行了一项全国性调查。这些病例在两个时间段收集,一个在1989 - 1990年百日咳流行开始前,另一个在流行的第一个高峰时。通过向报告医生邮寄调查问卷来确定疫苗接种状况,还收集了临床数据,以根据标准化病例定义提供效力估计值。总体而言,观察到的疫苗效力较高,但在流行期(87%)和非流行期(93%)有所不同(P = 0.03)。典型或重症病例的效力估计值通常高于非典型疾病儿童。疫苗效力随年龄下降(P < 0.01),但在8岁前估计值仍较高。本研究将提供基线数据,以便与在加速免疫程序下免疫儿童的类似研究以及其他地方进行的无细胞百日咳疫苗III期研究中观察到的效力进行比较。

相似文献

1
Age-specific efficacy of pertussis vaccine during epidemic and non-epidemic periods.百日咳疫苗在流行期和非流行期的年龄特异性效力。
Epidemiol Infect. 1993 Aug;111(1):41-8. doi: 10.1017/s095026880005665x.
2
[Monitoring of a whooping cough epidemic 1994/95 in Switzerland using the sentinel notification system. Sentinella Registry].[利用哨点通报系统对1994/95年瑞士百日咳疫情的监测。哨兵登记处]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1996 Aug 24;126(34):1423-32.
3
Whooping cough and pertussis vaccine: a comparison of risks and benefits in Britain during the period 1968-83.百日咳与百日咳疫苗:1968 - 1983年英国的风险与益处比较
Dev Biol Stand. 1985;61:395-405.
4
Vaccine efficacy and control measures in pertussis.百日咳的疫苗效力及控制措施
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jul;66(7):854-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.7.854.
5
Pertussis outbreaks in the developed world: are acellular pertussis vaccines ineffective? Point.发达国家的百日咳疫情:无细胞百日咳疫苗是否无效?观点。
Indian Pediatr. 2013 Dec;50(12):1109-11. doi: 10.1007/s13312-013-0298-3.
6
Effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccine and evolution of pertussis incidence in the community of Madrid from 1998 to 2015.1998 年至 2015 年马德里社区无细胞百日咳疫苗的有效性和百日咳发病率的演变。
Vaccine. 2018 Mar 14;36(12):1643-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.070. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
7
Evidence of whooping-cough-vaccine efficacy from the 1978 whooping-cough epidemic in Hertfordshire.1978年赫特福德郡百日咳疫情中百日咳疫苗效力的证据。
Lancet. 1979 Jul 28;2(8135):188-90. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91447-8.
8
Experiences with acellular pertussis vaccine in Japan and epidemiology of pertussis.日本无细胞百日咳疫苗的使用经验及百日咳流行病学
Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1987 Dec;12(5-6):263-73.
9
Pertussis vaccine effectiveness among children 6 to 59 months of age in the United States, 1998-2001.1998 - 2001年美国6至59个月大儿童的百日咳疫苗效力
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e285-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2759.
10
Duration of effectiveness of pertussis vaccine: evidence from a 10 year community study.百日咳疫苗的有效性持续时间:一项为期10年的社区研究证据
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 27;296(6622):612-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6622.612.

引用本文的文献

1
Seroepidemiology of pertussis in Huzhou: A population-based, cross-sectional study.湖州市百日咳血清流行病学研究:基于人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303508. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevention of pertussis: from clinical trials to Real World Evidence.百日咳的预防:从临床试验到真实世界证据
J Prev Med Hyg. 2018 Sep 28;59(3):E177-E186. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2018.59.3.1041. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Immune persistence after pertussis vaccination.百日咳疫苗接种后的免疫持久性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Apr 3;13(4):744-756. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1259780. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
4
Vaccination strategies against respiratory syncytial virus.针对呼吸道合胞病毒的疫苗接种策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):13239-13244. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522597113. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Oral fluid testing for pertussis, England and wales, june 2007-august 2009.2007年6月至2009年8月,英格兰和威尔士针对百日咳的口腔液体检测
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;20(6):968-75. doi: 10.3201/eid2006.131069.
6
Report of a pertussis outbreak in a low coverage booster vaccination group of otherwise healthy children in Italy.意大利一起低覆盖率加强免疫接种组中健康儿童百日咳暴发的报告。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Nov 14;13:541. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-541.
7
Increased population prevalence of low pertussis toxin antibody levels in young children preceding a record pertussis epidemic in Australia.在澳大利亚创纪录的百日咳流行之前,幼儿中低百日咳毒素抗体水平的人群流行率增加。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035874. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Accelerating control of pertussis in England and Wales.在英格兰和威尔士加快百日咳控制。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.3201/eid1801.110784.
9
Short-lived immunity against pertussis, age-specific routes of transmission, and the utility of a teenage booster vaccine.百日咳的短暂免疫力、特定年龄的传播途径,以及青少年加强疫苗的效用。
Vaccine. 2012 Jan 11;30(3):544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.065. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
10
Modelling the impact of extended vaccination strategies on the epidemiology of pertussis.建模延长疫苗接种策略对百日咳流行病学的影响。
Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Aug;140(8):1503-14. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811002354. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Severity of whooping cough in England before and after the decline in pertussis immunisation.百日咳免疫接种率下降前后英国百日咳的严重程度
Arch Dis Child. 1984 Feb;59(2):162-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.2.162.
2
Effect of vaccination on severity and dissemination of whooping cough.疫苗接种对百日咳严重程度及传播的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jun 13;282(6280):1925-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6280.1925.
3
Whooping-cough notifications.百日咳通报
Lancet. 1980 Mar 29;1(8170):718.
4
Field evaluation of vaccine efficacy.疫苗效力的现场评估。
Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(6):1055-68.
5
A search for subclinical infection during a small outbreak of whooping cough: implications for clinical diagnosis.百日咳小范围暴发期间亚临床感染的调查:对临床诊断的意义
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Dec;36(293):547-8.
6
Reflections on the efficacy of pertussis vaccines.关于百日咳疫苗效力的思考
Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Sep-Oct;9(5):866-83. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.5.866.
7
Duration of effectiveness of pertussis vaccine: evidence from a 10 year community study.百日咳疫苗的有效性持续时间:一项为期10年的社区研究证据
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 27;296(6622):612-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6622.612.
8
Assessing vaccine efficacy in the field. Further observations.评估现场疫苗效力。进一步观察。
Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:212-41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036023.
9
Laboratory diagnosis of pertussis: the state of the art.百日咳的实验室诊断:最新进展
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Feb;6(2):145-51. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198702000-00002.
10
COVER (cover of vaccination evaluated rapidly): description of the England and Wales scheme.COVER(快速评估的疫苗接种覆盖情况):英格兰和威尔士计划说明。
Public Health. 1989 Mar;103(2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(89)80021-6.