• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择与拒绝:为何有些选项比其他选项既更好又更糟。

Choosing versus rejecting: why some options are both better and worse than others.

作者信息

Shafir E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, NJ 08544.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):546-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03197186.

DOI:10.3758/bf03197186
PMID:8350746
Abstract

A previously unobserved pattern of choice behavior is predicted and corroborated. In line with the principle of compatibility, according to which the weighting of inputs is enhanced by their compatibility with output, the positive and negative dimensions of options (their pros and cons) are expected to loom larger when one is choosing and when one is rejecting, respectively. Subjects are presented with pairs of options, one of which--the enriched option--has more positive as well as more negative dimensions than does the other, impoverished, option. Because positive dimensions are weighted more heavily in choosing than in rejecting, and negative dimensions are weighted more heavily in rejecting than in choosing, the enriched option tends to be chosen and rejected relatively more often than the impoverished option. These findings are extended to nonbinary decision problems, and their implications for the rational theory of choice and for everyday decisions are discussed.

摘要

一种此前未被观察到的选择行为模式得到了预测和证实。根据兼容性原则,即输入的权重会因其与输出的兼容性而增强,在选择和拒绝时,选项的积极和消极维度(其优点和缺点)预计会分别显得更为突出。向受试者呈现成对的选项,其中一个——丰富选项——比另一个贫瘠选项具有更多的积极维度和更多的消极维度。由于积极维度在选择时比在拒绝时权重更大,而消极维度在拒绝时比在选择时权重更大,丰富选项往往比贫瘠选项被选择和拒绝的频率相对更高。这些发现被扩展到非二元决策问题,并讨论了它们对理性选择理论和日常决策的影响。

相似文献

1
Choosing versus rejecting: why some options are both better and worse than others.选择与拒绝:为何有些选项比其他选项既更好又更糟。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):546-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03197186.
2
Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.决策者将他们的选择视为干预措施。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):22-38. doi: 10.1037/a0014585.
3
Another look at reasons for choosing and rejecting.再看选择与拒绝的理由。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Nov;25(6):873-87. doi: 10.3758/bf03211332.
4
The causal psycho-logic of choice.选择的因果心理逻辑。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
5
Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.决策过程:对顺序经历的结果概率的敏感性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 May;97(1):28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
6
Why some are perceived as more confident and more insecure, more reckless and more cautious, more trusting and more suspicious, than others: enriched and impoverished options in social judgment.为什么有些人比其他人被认为更自信、更缺乏安全感、更鲁莽、更谨慎、更信任他人、更多疑:社会判断中的丰富和匮乏选项。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):598-610. doi: 10.3758/bf03212968.
7
Delay, doubt, and decision: how delaying a choice reduces the appeal of (descriptively) normative options.拖延、怀疑和决策:为什么延迟选择会降低(描述性)规范性选项的吸引力。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):568-73. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363546. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
8
Role of accentuation in the selection/rejection task framing effect.强调在选择/拒绝任务框架效应中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Apr;146(4):543-568. doi: 10.1037/xge0000277.
9
The role of free choice in memory for past decisions.自由选择在对过去决策的记忆中的作用。
Memory. 2006 Nov;14(8):1001-11. doi: 10.1080/09658210601046163.
10
Choosing an inferior alternative.选择较差的替代方案。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):899-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01800.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Discrete choice experiments: a primer for the communication researcher.离散选择实验:传播研究者入门指南
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2025;10. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1385422. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Thinking in opposites improves hypothesis testing performance in Wason's rule-discovery task.逆向思维可提高在沃森规则发现任务中的假设检验表现。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01691-3.
3
Framing the Default.框架默认值。

本文引用的文献

1
Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information.
J Exp Psychol. 1962 Feb;63:105-10. doi: 10.1037/h0045304.
2
S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.S-R兼容性:刺激与反应编码的空间特征。
J Exp Psychol. 1953 Sep;46(3):199-210. doi: 10.1037/h0062827.
3
Mental addition versus subtraction in counterfactual reasoning: on assessing the impact of personal actions and life events.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Jul;57(1):5-15. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.1.5.
4
Exp Psychol. 2024 May;71(3):164-175. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000617. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Methodological concerns underlying a lack of evidence for cultural heterogeneity in the replication of psychological effects.心理效应复制中文化异质性缺乏证据背后的方法学问题。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;2(1):93. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00135-z.
5
Exploring the Impact of Sustainability Trade-Offs: The Role of Product and Sustainability Types in Consumer Purchases Mediated by Moral Regulation.探索可持续性权衡的影响:产品和可持续性类型在道德规范介导的消费者购买行为中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;14(8):702. doi: 10.3390/bs14080702.
6
A framing effect in the judgment of discrimination.歧视判断中的框架效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2205988119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205988119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
7
Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?一举两得:如果要超越传统的单一最佳离散选择实验,我们应该使用最佳最差、最佳最佳还是排序法来进行偏好 elicitation?
Health Econ. 2022 Dec;31(12):2630-2647. doi: 10.1002/hec.4599. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Political differentiation and consolidation of choice in a U.S. media malaise environment: indirect effects of perceived alikeness on voter participation.美国媒体萎靡环境下的政治分化与选择巩固:感知相似性对选民参与的间接影响
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(7):106. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00394-9. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Vaccinated or not? Survey on attitude toward 'approach-avoidance conflict' under uncertainty.是否接种疫苗?对不确定性下“趋近-回避冲突”态度的调查。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1967038. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Self-Initiated Actions Under Different Choice Architectures Affect Framing and Target Evaluation Even Without Verbal Manipulation.即使没有言语操控,不同选择架构下的自主行动也会影响框架构建和目标评估。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1449. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01449. eCollection 2020.
Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.维度重叠:刺激-反应兼容性的认知基础——一个模型与分类法
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253.
5
Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication.医学和司法领域对使用抗精神病药物相关风险的认知。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1991;19(3):271-5.