Björkman M, Juslin P, Winman A
Uppsala University, Sweden.
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Jul;54(1):75-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03206939.
This paper documents a very pervasive underconfidence bias in the area of sensory discrimination. In order to account for this phenomenon, a subjective distance theory of confidence in sensory discrimination is proposed. This theory, based on the law of comparative judgment and the assumption of confidence as an increasing function of the perceived distance between stimuli, predicts underconfidence--that is, that people should perform better than they express in their confidence assessments. Due to the fixed sensitivity of the sensory system, this underconfidence bias is practically impossible to avoid. The results of Experiment 1 confirmed the prediction of underconfidence with the help of present-day calibration methods and indicated a good quantitative fit of the theory. The results of Experiment 2 showed that prolonged experience of outcome feedback (160 trials) had no effect on underconfidence. It is concluded that the subjective distance theory provides a better explanation of the underconfidence phenomenon than do previous accounts in terms of subconscious processes.
本文记录了感觉辨别领域中一种非常普遍的信心不足偏差。为了解释这一现象,提出了一种关于感觉辨别信心的主观距离理论。该理论基于比较判断定律以及信心是刺激间感知距离的递增函数这一假设,预测了信心不足——也就是说,人们实际表现应优于他们在信心评估中所表达的。由于感觉系统的敏感性固定,这种信心不足偏差实际上难以避免。实验1的结果借助当今的校准方法证实了信心不足的预测,并表明该理论具有良好的定量拟合度。实验2的结果表明,长时间的结果反馈经验(160次试验)对信心不足没有影响。得出的结论是,与之前基于潜意识过程的解释相比,主观距离理论能更好地解释信心不足现象。