Quarles R P, Mintun M A, Larson K B, Markham J, MacLeod A M, Raichle M E
Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993 Sep;13(5):733-47. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.94.
To further our understanding of the best way to measure regional CBF with positron emission tomography (PET), we directly compared two candidate tracers ([15O]water and [11C]butanol, administered intravenously) and two popular implementations of the one-compartment (1C) model: the autoradiographic implementation representing a single PET measurement of tissue radioactivity over 1 min and a dynamic implementation representing a sequence of measurements of tissue radioactivity over 200 s. We also examined the feasibility of implementing a more realistic, and thus more complex, distributed-parameter (DP) model by assigning fixed values for all of its parameters other than CBF and tracer volume of distribution (Vd), a requirement imposed by the low temporal resolution and statistical quality of PET data. The studies were performed in three normal adult human subjects during paired rest and visual stimulation. In each subject seven regions of interest (ROIs) were selected, one of which was the primary visual cortex. The corresponding ROI were anatomically equivalent in the three subjects. Regional CBF, Vd, tracer arrival delay, and dispersion were estimated for the dynamic data curves. A total of 252 parameter sets were estimated. With [11C]butanol both implementations of the 1C model provided similar results (r = 0.97). Flows estimated using the 1C models were lower (p < 0.01) with [15O]water than with [11C]butanol. In comparison with the 1C model, the constrained version of the DP used in these studies performed inadequately, overestimating high flow and underestimating low flow with both tracers, possibly as the result of the necessity of assigning fixed values for all of its parameters other than CBF and Vd.
为了进一步了解使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量局部脑血流量(CBF)的最佳方法,我们直接比较了两种候选示踪剂(静脉注射的[15O]水和[11C]丁醇)以及单室(1C)模型的两种常用实现方式:放射自显影实现方式,代表在1分钟内对组织放射性进行单次PET测量;动态实现方式,代表在200秒内对组织放射性进行一系列测量。我们还研究了通过为除CBF和示踪剂分布容积(Vd)之外的所有参数指定固定值来实现更现实、因而更复杂的分布参数(DP)模型的可行性,这是PET数据的低时间分辨率和统计质量所要求的。研究在三名正常成年人类受试者休息和视觉刺激配对期间进行。在每个受试者中选择了七个感兴趣区域(ROI),其中一个是初级视觉皮层。三个受试者中的相应ROI在解剖学上是等效的。对动态数据曲线估计了局部CBF、Vd、示踪剂到达延迟和弥散。总共估计了252个参数集。使用[11C]丁醇时,1C模型的两种实现方式提供了相似的结果(r = 0.97)。使用[15O]水时,1C模型估计的血流量比使用[11C]丁醇时更低(p < 0.01)。与1C模型相比,这些研究中使用的DP约束版本表现不佳,两种示踪剂都高估了高流量并低估了低流量,这可能是由于除CBF和Vd之外的所有参数都需要指定固定值的缘故。