Herrington C S, Anderson S M, Graham A K, McGee J O
University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Pathology and Bacteriology, John Radcliffe Hospital, UK.
Histochem J. 1993 Mar;25(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00163814.
The parameter Tmt has been defined by non-isotopic in situ hybridization and describes the tissue melting temperature (Tmt) of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA sequences. In this study, multiple in situ hybridization signals for HPV types 16, 31 and 33 in individual archival biopsies hybridized with genomic probes are shown by polymerase chain reactions to be due to cross-hybridization of probe sequences to a single tissue target. Tmt is independent of viral type but depends on the homology between probe and target when using nick-translated whole genomic probes. The difference between Tm and Tmt is not due to the presence of viral capsid protein. Multiple HPV signals in archival material should not therefore be interpreted as indicative of multiple HPV infection unless adequate stringency conditions have been employed or they are present in morphologically distinct areas of the biopsy. Furthermore, extrapolation of calculated DNA homologies to non-isotopic in situ hybridization analysis may not be appropriate. A hybridization signal does not imply probe and target identity: this has implications for HPV typing in clinical material.
参数Tmt已通过非同位素原位杂交定义,描述了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA序列的组织解链温度(Tmt)。在本研究中,通过聚合酶链反应显示,与基因组探针杂交的个体存档活检组织中HPV 16、31和33型的多个原位杂交信号是由于探针序列与单个组织靶标的交叉杂交所致。当使用缺口平移的全基因组探针时,Tmt与病毒类型无关,但取决于探针与靶标的同源性。Tm和Tmt之间的差异并非由于病毒衣壳蛋白的存在。因此,除非采用了足够严格的条件,或者它们存在于活检组织形态学上不同的区域,否则存档材料中的多个HPV信号不应被解释为指示多重HPV感染。此外,将计算出的DNA同源性外推至非同位素原位杂交分析可能并不合适。杂交信号并不意味着探针与靶标相同:这对临床材料中的HPV分型具有影响。