Suppr超能文献

通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)和非同位素原位杂交检测人乳头瘤病毒的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by PCR and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.

作者信息

Herrington C S, Anderson S M, Bauer H M, Troncone B, de Angelis M L, Noell H, Chimera J A, Van Eyck S L, McGee J O

机构信息

University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1995 May;48(5):415-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.415.

Abstract

AIMS--To assess the relative diagnostic performance of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation (NISH) and to correlate these data with cytopathological assessment. METHODS--Paired analysis of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection was performed by PCR and NISH on exfoliated cervical cells from 122 women attending a routine gynaecological examination. PCR amplification followed by generic and HPV type specific hybridisation was compared with NISH on a parallel cervical smear. RESULTS--Overall, 32 cases were positive by NISH and 61 positive by PCR. Of the 105 cases in which both PCR and NISH were interpretable, 76 (26%) were normal smears, 20 of which were HPV positive by NISH and 37 (49%) by PCR. Of 17 borderline smears, two were NISH positive and 12 PCR positive. Eight of nine smears containing koilocytes were positive by NISH and seven by PCR. Of three dyskaryotic smears, none were NISH and two were PCR positive. The concordance of NISH and PCR in these samples was 57%. To assess sampling error, NISH and PCR were performed on an additional 50 cases using aliquots from the same sample. This increased the concordance between assays to 74%. Filter hybridisation of PCR products with the cocktail of probes used in NISH (under low and high stringency conditions) demonstrated that several cases of NISH positivity could be accounted for by cross-hybridisation to HPV types identified by PCR but not present in the NISH probe cocktail. CONCLUSIONS--Sampling error and potential cross-hybridisation of probe and target should be considered in interpretation of these techniques. PCR is more sensitive because it provides for the amplification of target DNA sequences. In addition, the PCR assay utilised in this study detects a wider range of HPV types than are contained in the cocktails used for NISH. However, PCR assays detect viral DNA present both within cells and in cervical fluid whereas NISH permits morphological localisation.

摘要

目的——评估聚合酶链反应(PCR)和非同位素原位杂交(NISH)的相对诊断性能,并将这些数据与细胞病理学评估相关联。方法——对122名参加常规妇科检查的女性的脱落宫颈细胞进行PCR和NISH检测,以对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测进行配对分析。将PCR扩增后进行的通用型和HPV型特异性杂交与平行宫颈涂片上的NISH进行比较。结果——总体而言,NISH检测出32例阳性,PCR检测出61例阳性。在PCR和NISH均可解读的105例病例中,76例(26%)涂片正常,其中20例NISH检测HPV呈阳性,37例(49%)PCR检测呈阳性。在17例临界涂片病例中,2例NISH呈阳性,12例PCR呈阳性。9例含有空泡细胞的涂片中,8例NISH呈阳性,7例PCR呈阳性。3例核异质涂片均未检测出NISH阳性,2例PCR呈阳性。这些样本中NISH和PCR的一致性为57%。为评估抽样误差,使用同一样本的等分试样对另外50例病例进行NISH和PCR检测。这使检测之间的一致性提高到74%。PCR产物与NISH中使用的探针混合物进行滤膜杂交(在低严谨度和高严谨度条件下)表明,NISH阳性的几例病例可能是由于与PCR鉴定出但NISH探针混合物中不存在的HPV类型发生交叉杂交所致。结论——在解释这些技术时应考虑抽样误差以及探针与靶标的潜在交叉杂交。PCR更敏感,因为它能扩增靶DNA序列。此外,本研究中使用的PCR检测法能检测到比NISH所用混合物中包含的更广泛的HPV类型。然而,PCR检测法能检测到细胞内和宫颈液中存在的病毒DNA,而NISH可进行形态学定位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/621b/502615/dc1105d49025/jclinpath00230-0025-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验